Skip to comments.
Trump screws everyone but himself
americanthinker.com ^
| 2/1/2016
| Ed Lasky
Posted on 02/01/2016 6:05:20 AM PST by rktman
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 next last
Hmmm. Well, Iowans and everybody else. Looks to me like the train keeps rolling along and all the republicrat infighting will help enable hildebeast or uncle bernie to move up to the locomotive and speed us headlong in to the abyss. Seriously, shouldn't we be focusing on derailing those two assclowns as quickly as possible? If we don't, the stars and stripes may never see the light of day on my flag pole again. She came down nearly 4 years ago when the lyin' king garnered enough votes to remain in place. I'm not ready to retire the colors just yet.
1
posted on
02/01/2016 6:05:20 AM PST
by
rktman
To: rktman
Yep, the enemy is on the other side of the aisle, and hopefully, the focus will soon shift towards that.
I wonder how many of those who have been most shrill during this campaign will actually vote for the Republican nominee?
2
posted on
02/01/2016 6:07:37 AM PST
by
kingu
(Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
To: rktman
It’s not like we’ve been well served by either party. Hence Trump.
3
posted on
02/01/2016 6:08:23 AM PST
by
refermech
To: rktman
So long as he screws the GOPe harder than he screws the rest of the country, it may work out. I’d prefer a more aspirational president, but these are unusual times. Still don’t see a need to change my tagline.
4
posted on
02/01/2016 6:09:33 AM PST
by
Night Hides Not
(Remember the Alamo! Remember Goliad! Remember Mississippi! My vote is going to Cruz.)
To: rktman
>>> Trump screws everyone but himself <<<
Hemorrhoids?
5
posted on
02/01/2016 6:10:58 AM PST
by
JJ_Folderol
(Just my opinion and only worth what you paid for it.)
To: rktman
I’m giving Cruz a chance to fix it. Failing that, I’m going Galt.
6
posted on
02/01/2016 6:11:05 AM PST
by
bolobaby
To: rktman
Another Trump hit piece.
On Iowa Caucus Day.
How unique /s
7
posted on
02/01/2016 6:11:54 AM PST
by
exit82
("The Taliban is on the inside of the building" E. Nordstrom 10-10-12)
To: rktman
Yeah. The millions of people on his payroll would argue differently.
To: refermech
Itâs not like we've been well served by either party..
9
posted on
02/01/2016 6:12:56 AM PST
by
Jeff Chandler
(I shot Schroedinger's cat with Chekhov's gun.)
To: refermech
AT have lost their collective minds in the past fortnight.
The Guardian has more sympathetic Trump coverage.
10
posted on
02/01/2016 6:13:34 AM PST
by
relictele
(Principiis obsta & Finem respice - Resist The Beginnings & Consider The Ends)
To: rktman
Another stupid article whining about made up stuff. In their great “concern” about Donald Trump and eminent domain those who oppose him can only come up with ONE example that on the surface even looks remotely bad. And they only make it look bad by using the term “elderly widow”. This elderly widow BEAT Trump. And this elderly widow screwed herself out of millions of dollars that Trump would have given her for her home. And Trump did nothing illegal. So nice try.
To: rktman
Lighten up, Ed. We got this.
12
posted on
02/01/2016 6:14:01 AM PST
by
Duke C.
To: exit82
Caucus starts in 10 1/2 hours... So still a lot of time. I am guessing one slam of Trump every 15 minutes, not counting duplicate posts.
13
posted on
02/01/2016 6:15:41 AM PST
by
BigEdLB
(Take it Easy, Chuck. I'm Not Taking it Back -- Donald Trump)
To: kingu
“I wonder how many of those who have been most shrill during this campaign will actually vote for the Republican nominee?”
If the Republican Party nominated Fidel Castro or one of Queen Noor’s sons and Princes of Jordan, would you vote for them? Would you vote for Arnold Schwarzenegger?
14
posted on
02/01/2016 6:16:01 AM PST
by
WhiskeyX
To: kingu
I wonder how many of those who have been most shrill during this campaign will actually vote for the Republican nominee?Well I sure will! I'm not going to cut off my nose to spite my face just to teach the GOPe a lesson. How about we teach them a lesson when the salvation of our country isn't so much on the line, as another 4 years of Clinton will most certainly take us over the edge!
15
posted on
02/01/2016 6:17:55 AM PST
by
CAluvdubya
(<---has now left CA for NV, where God/guns have not been outlawed! Trump and Cruz, abolish the GOPe!)
To: rktman
And this infantile diatribe is published by something calling itself “American Thinker”? That’s a joke.
16
posted on
02/01/2016 6:18:15 AM PST
by
Pravious
To: rktman
He may be a con artist, but he's our con artist.
17
posted on
02/01/2016 6:22:02 AM PST
by
Mr Ramsbotham
(Laws against sodomy are honored in the breech.)
To: kingu
My central question too, but my answer is still the same, No more Lesser of Two Evils.
18
posted on
02/01/2016 6:24:44 AM PST
by
nomad
To: rktman
WIth Trump’s 60% negatives if he wins the nomination it ensures a dem victory. Clinton won’t be the nominee, she will have a “health crisis” Biden will be the nominee.
19
posted on
02/01/2016 6:25:46 AM PST
by
Leto
To: Mr Ramsbotham
LOL! You talkin’ about Trump or the lyin’ king?
20
posted on
02/01/2016 6:25:57 AM PST
by
rktman
(Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson