To: zeestephen; Carry_Okie; Liz; SunkenCiv
A cashless society — the ‘EMP’ of economics.
Why not allow freedom to choose cash or not choose cash?
Choose gold or not choose gold?
Etc.
Freedom. That’s what we need more of.
78 posted on
02/01/2016 5:06:57 AM PST by
Arthur Wildfire! March
(Cruz and Trump FRiends strongest when we don't insult each other.)
To: Arthur Wildfire! March
79 posted on
02/01/2016 5:08:13 AM PST by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
To: Arthur Wildfire! March; AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ...
99 posted on
02/01/2016 6:02:03 AM PST by
SunkenCiv
(Here's to the day the forensics people scrape what's left of Putin off the ceiling of his limo.)
To: Arthur Wildfire! March; TheThirdRuffian
Re: “Why not allow freedom to choose cash or not choose cash?”
I agree, that’s the way it should be handled.
I was responding only to the idea that a cashless society is a problem for, or a potential danger to, those of us who choose to go cashless.
A mandatory cashless society does limit freedom.
But it also makes life much more complicated, and much more dangerous, for criminals, too, which is not a bad thing.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson