Video: Hillary Clinton is finally confronted with her classified data non-disclosure agreement

Hot Air.com ^ | January 31, 2016 | JAZZ SHAW

[RummyChick]

They need to indict her so Obama can pardon her. She needs this cleared before Trump gets in office.

[hal ogen]

So what? Until any of our “leaders” does anything to hold her accountable...so what? Our banana republic is criminal-infused, unfortunately.

[bigbob]

Not surprsingly, she doesn’t give a damn about releasing classified information, as long as she thinks it give her personally some kind of cover.

What can be said about Clinton ethics that hasn’t already been said?

[Da Coyote]

Ah, Ms Consented to be Cuckolded.

A bimbo witch if there ever was one.

[ImJustAnotherOkie]

Feel sorry for George? Good one!!!

[doldrumsforgop]

“They need to indict her so Obama can pardon her.”

No need for indictment. Precedent was set by Ford.

Nixon was never indicted yet was pardoned.

[FlingWingFlyer]

The idiot was on the boob tube last week saying she takes “responsibility” for her private server fiasco. Now she’s saying that she isn’t responsible if her peons sent her classified documents on her private email server. Which is it? Her peons can’t be held responsible if her private email was they only way she could be reached. She might be the most “qualified” person ever to live to be “president” as her toads at the New Yawk Times are reporting but she is still a drooling, blithering idiot. Bull**** on a political resume does not make one “qualified” to be the President of the United States. Obama is proof of that.

[Jet Jaguar]

[Liz]

[RummyChick]

You are right. There is a SCOTUS case on the issue.

What really hasn’t been addressed is if a POTUS can pardon himself.

[Leaning Right]

The question is not whether or not Hillary did anything illegal. Everyone over the age of 10 knows she did, even if some won’t admit it.

The question is why (surprisingly) Clinton hack George Stephanopoulos decided to press Hillary on it.

[DoughtyOne]

[Bodleian_Girl]

Why does she get a free pass?

[El.Cid803]

Clinton. Ethics. IN THE SAME SENTENCE...OMG stop, you’re killing me.

[kabar]

Clinton: You know, you can't get information off the classified system in the State Department to put on an unclassified system, no matter what that system is. We were very specific about that.

This is very significant. It appears to me as someone who worked 28 years for the State Department that Hillary is going to throw someone under the bus. An aide or several will be blamed for the migration of the material from the classified system (SIPRNet) to the unsecured system (NIPRNet), It remains to be seen if they are willing to take the fall for Hillary in return for some reward later on.

The classified system is totally separate from the unclassified system. There is no way electronically material can migrate between them. Some one has to do it manually.

I find Clinton's parsing of language to mean that someone else will be blamed. The "'We' were very specific about that" means that she never never ordered or was aware that someone was moving classified information to her over the unclassified system. No doubt, this will be her legal defense.

Since it is a felony, there are very serious consequences for anyone not named Clinton.

[Kaslin]

She's a Clinton.

Did you really have to ask?

[Liz]

MEMO TO THE FBI There is new evidence surfacing that neither Hillary nor her key staff signed the official State Dept exit form required upon termination of employment.

My gut feeling is the cunning Clintonids didn't sign off b/c that would have cutoff their access to classified and other State Dept info......info the greedy Clintons and their cronies use to cash-in.

==============================================

The FBI should determine if Huma Abedin, Cheryl Mills, Sid Blumenthal and other Clinton cronies are STILL considered State Dept employees---perhaps as contractors--- and are still receiving classified State Dept mail and cashing US govt paychecks.

REFERENCE Brian Pagliano---billed as Hillary's personal IT--- left her employ then surfaced on the public payroll as a State Dept contractor.

======================================

Taxpayers demand to know who else among the Clinton cronies are cashing US govt paychecks. It's an old bureaucratic trick for a politician to hand-pick top aides and put them on the public payroll long after you think they're gone. Who might still be cashing State Dept paychecks?

<><> Hillary?

<><> Bill Clinton?

<><> Sid Blumenthal?

<><> Huma Abedin,

<><> Anthony Weiner, Huma's husband?

<><> Cheryl Mills?

<><> Cheryl mills' live-in David Domenici?

<><> Chelsea Clinton?

<><> Chelsea's husband?

========================================

FREEPER ACTION NOW---CONTACT CONGRESS HERE: http://www.contactingthecongress.org/

Demand Congress send you all available information on individuals connected to Hillary still cashing US govt paychecks.

In light of the $6 billion that went missing from the State Dept's contractor fund when Hillary exited, taxpayers demand to know who is listed as a State Dept contractor....and whether they are receiving classified State Dept info.

[DoughtyOne]

I sense you are causing a disturbance in the force.

And now your neighbors all know!

[Thumper1960]

Hildebeast incorrectly wrote the date of the signed form. It requires a mm/dd/yyyy entry and Hildebeast wrote it in dd/mm/yyyy. It can argue that the form is null and void due to improper entries. Therefore, the form has no relevance.