[Lazamataz]

The New York Times just endorsed a multiple felon who may not even make the summer without indictment.

They don't care. Hell, they covered up Stalin's Holodomar and held Adolph Hitler as the 'Rising Star' of Germany. They have often willingly compromised national military secrets, seemingly in an intentional bid to harm America.

These people are pure, unadulterated evil. If Satan himself appeared on the political landscape, the Editorial Board of the New York Times would plead for us to give his ideas "a fair chance".

In any national convulsion, any United-States-wide cataclysm, the New York Times CANNOT BE ALLOWED TO EMERGE ON THE OTHER SIDE.

[roadcat]

Democratic primary voters, on the other hand, after a substantive debate over real issues, have the chance to nominate one of the most broadly and deeply qualified presidential candidates in modern history.

What has she done that matches the deeply qualified experience(s) of other presidents?

Oh yeah, she tripped on her face while boarding government planes (while drunk as heck). She lies constantly. She alters her message contradicting herself (and her voice) depending on which audience she addresses. She's absent while bad stuff goes down on our troops and agents (very like Obama). She accepts money from outside parties to influence government decisions enriching the outside bribers.

So she has a few "qualifications". None qualify her to fix the problems of our nation.

[DoughtyOne]

[indthkr]

New York values at work.

[RightGeek]

[Slyfox]

[TruthWillWin]

For the past painful year, the Republican presidential contenders have been bombarding Americans with empty propaganda slogans and competing, bizarrely, to present themselves as the least experienced person for the most important elected job in the world. Democratic primary voters, on the other hand, after a substantive debate over real issues, have the chance to nominate one of the most broadly and deeply qualified presidential candidates in modern history.

Nope, not a hint of bias here..../s

[Steve_Seattle]

The New York Times Editorial Board is composed of morons and hypocrites.

[Steve_Seattle]

God forgive me, but if the NYT editorial board was subject to a Charlie Hebdo-type attack, I would applaud. I detest those people.

[Impy]

Hillary Clinton would be the first woman nominated by a major party.

James "Aunt Fancy" Buchanan (D) was close enough.

[Fresh Wind]