Posted on 01/31/2016 10:36:13 AM PST by txnativegop
"The relationship between Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe (D) and gun control groups is quickly souring after critics say he caved to pressure from the National Rifle Association.
Virginia will now recognize concealed carry permits from dozens of other states with what critics say are weaker gun laws than the commonwealth."
(Excerpt) Read more at msn.com ...
Puhleeze. They don’t want to tie Hillary to him in November. If anyone here thinks there is another reason for it, sorry, you are sadly mistaken.
Democrats have an agenda for everything. They are like the old Soviet Politburo, minus the sense of humor.
It is msn — I don’t expect anything close to honesty from them. It is typical leftist spin on what happened.
but it worked in the favor of citizens of Virginia.
Keep it up Terry and someday you might even see the light and turn republican le lol (that’s French for lol)
Yes, it worked in favor of the majority, not the minority liberal gun grabbers.
The threat of political repercussions made this politician do the right thing, as our system was designed to do.
But when a politician faces Zero repercussions for going against the will of the people, tyranny gets a foothold.
so very true. Eternal vigilance is required.
Only after a herd of bull Elk fly overhead.
He would have lost an override vote therefore he did what he felt would not look the worst of two options. He also has some thinking he did a “good” thing. There was no “good”...he just didn’t want the political defeat of a veto override. There’s also a victory for him in the new legislation somewhere IN there IIRC.
Then let us find out how he benefited from the legislation and work to remove it from the law.
Yep but it was his AG, Mark Herring, who tried to accomplish this. McAuliffe was placed in Virginia for one purpose only — deliver Virginia to the Democrats. He can’t afford to be sidetracked!!! He quickly saw that this was going to disturb the plan.
Correct. Virginia will be a swing state and this would push it Red for sure. He tried to elminate an issue.
Both of you are right to question the MSN perspective on this. I’m copying an e-mail sent out by the Virginia Citizens Defense League which has been closely involved since the AG’s move. Read Below:
Email alert from VCDL:
BREAKING NEWS: *** February 1 cutoff date for dropping recognition of 25 states has been extended to March 1 ***
THE “DEAL”
As you’ve undoubtedly heard from the media, there is a package deal in the works between Governor McAuliffe and the Republicans in the General Assembly dealing with 1) concealed handgun permit (CHP) reciprocity, 2) voluntary background checks at gunshows, and 3) those subject to a permanent domestic violence protection order.
To many CHP holders, CHP reciprocity is a HUGE deal, especially if they travel out-of-state regularly and want to be able to carry discretely. For example, there is no solution to carrying in South Carolina if we don’t have an agreement between our two states.
There is a lot of misinformation from the media and elsewhere and a lot of people are coming to the wrong conclusions about what the deal does and doesn’t do. Rumors are flying that gun owners only get back the reciprocity that was taken away by Herring and the State Police - that is FALSE. We have gained important ground!
THE DEAL IS STILL IN THE WORKS. Things could still go south as the key bills that make up the deal work their way through the legislature and onto the Governor’s desk. SO, FOR NOW, NOTHING HAS CHANGED. THERE IS NO ABSOLUTE GUARANTEE THIS WILL BECOME LAW, BUT A REASONABLY GOOD CHANCE IT WILL. If it fails, we may not be able to fix the reciprocity situation for another two-long-years.
VCDL has been privy to the deal for several days, as was a national group. VCDL monitored progress of this potentially groundbreaking advancement of our liberty from its genesis, and provided counsel and discussion points during its evolution.
The final product was given the nod by VCDL, however we will be watching like a hawk for any changes that negatively affect gun owners.
IMPORTANT DETAILS ON THE “DEAL”
There are three components that make up the deal, each component represented by matching bills in the House and in the Senate.
#1 - Reciprocity details - gun owners gain ground!
* Virginia will honor the carry permits from ALL states! This is considerably better than current law and something VCDL has been trying to get for at least seven years now.
* Because Virginia will honor all other states, Virginia CHPs will be recognized by all the states we have lost AND we will gain some new states: New Hampshire, Georgia, and Colorado!
* The State Police and the Attorney General will have NO say in the new law. If another state requires a formal agreement to honor Virginia CHPs, the new law requires the Attorney General to enter into any such agreement. If he fails to do this, item #3, below, does not go into effect.
* One other change on the reciprocity law: If your Virginia CHP is revoked for cause, you won’t be able to carry on a non-resident permit from another state. Not a deal breaker.
NOTE: Just because we are honoring all other states, doesn’t mean we can carry in all those states. Someone from New York will be able to carry here, but we won’t be able to carry in New York unless New York is willing to enter into a reciprocal agreement with Virginia, for example.
As more and more states start honoring out-of-state permits, the prospects of our permit being honored by even more states down the road is bright!
#2 - Voluntary gun show background checks
* Background checks for a private sale are COMPLETELY voluntary.
* The State Police shall be at every gun show in Virginia, by law. (Some gun owners were thinking this was some kind of a trick - that if the State Police don’t show up, the gun show would be cancelled. This should put that worry to rest.)
* The gun show promoter shall notify the State Police of the location and times of the gun show at least 30 days in advance, shall provide a free location for the police to set up, and shall have signs letting attendees know of the voluntary background checks at the State Police booth. (I checked with one of Virginia’s largest gun show promoters on this to see if any of it was objectionable and was told, “no.”)
* The State Police may charge a reasonable fee. (If they charge more than you want to pay, you can just walk away and do the transaction without the background check.)
* NO information on the make, model, or serial number of the gun being sold will be provided to the State Police - i.e. no federal Form 4473! The purchaser will have to fill out the Virginia form, which asks a few questions and has the buyer’s name, address, and signature. (If you don’t want to fill out that form, you can just walk away and do the transaction without the background check.)
* There is a carrot: if a background check is run, the seller receives some special legal protections that are currently not available for private sales. If a background check is not run, you don’t have any more or any less legal protections than under current law.
Yes, down the road inevitably there will be some bills introduced that attempt to make the background check mandatory. We get bills on mandatory background checks for private sales every year. We will have to fight and defeat those bills in the future, just as we fight and defeat similar bills today.
For those gun owners who would feel safer selling a gun to someone who has had a background check, this provides a new option in addition to the current option of either asking if the person has a CHP or going through the more laborious and expensive route of letting an FFL do the transfer. It also has no effect on private sales conducted anywhere outside of gun shows, where this voluntary option is not provided.
#3 - Persons subject to a PERMANENT domestic violence protection order cannot possess firearms until the order expires
* The ONLY permanent protection order this restriction applies to is one for domestic violence and NOTHING else.
* The subject of the protection order must have had his day in court along with any legal counsel. Temporary protection orders do NOT affect possession of firearms.
* If the judge, after hearing the defense, decides to issue a permanent protection order anyhow, the subject of the protection order will lose his gun rights for the duration of the order (MAXIMUM of two years), and automatically get those gun rights back when the permanent protection order expires. Note: a new permanent protection order could potentially be issued when the perament protection order expires if the judge thinks a danger still exists.
* The subject of the permanent protection order will have 24 hours to turn his guns over to a person of his choice, as long as that person can legally possess firearms.
* The above is basically federal law already, and state law already prohibits a person with such a permanent protection order from purchasing or transporting a firearm.
WHAT’S NEXT?
* VCDL will be monitoring the deal’s progress, watching for changes that negatively affect gun owners.
* If a negative issue arises and is not fixed quickly, I will advise all of you immediately via an Urgent Legislative Action Alert.
* I will also be providing links to the three bills described above as soon as the final language is available online. That way you can read them for yourself.
* For now just standby on this, as I keep you advised of the progress of the deal.
* If you don’t have any absolutely urgent questions, please hold on to them for now as it would be easy to overwhelm me with emails (I’m already getting over 200 a day as is).
Somebody should have checked with women on their concept of "God given rights" before making them more than 50% of the electorate.
This ain't your "Father's" Constitution....
It’s not like he had a choice.
The legislature was going to override any veto and they are the ones who pass laws.
thanks for attaching the email.
I’m not surprised in the slightest.
BINGO
Hoorah! Now we can vacation at Virginia Beach again.
It sounds like McAuliffe and his A-Hole AG will be sorry they picked this fight.
I live in Ca, the most 2nd amendment unfriendly place there is, but I’ll take a victory for freedom wherever it’s found.
Ya gotta read the fine print. It was a compromise. Not all is as it seems.
He can run again. All he could have done was hurt his fellow Dems. And that’s not a bad thing, but better to get this over with.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.