Posted on 01/28/2016 8:22:06 AM PST by TangledUpInBlue
I say that because there's no reason to think that Trump won't turn on a dime the instant he has to face a general electorate, and begin advocating a whole new set of policies. He adopted an entirely new set of beliefs for this race, one attuned to what his current audience wants — not just xenophobic, but fervently pro-life, pro-gun, pro-God, and pro-whatever else he thinks primary voters want to hear. Trump panders shamelessly to whoever he's talking to, he has no genuine ideology, and he won't feel tied to anything he's said before, any more than he's tied to his previous positions on health care or abortion.
Unlike other politicians who struggle to explain any hint of contradiction between what they're advocating now and what they've advocated before, Trump waves it all away. Remember all the painful contortions Mitt Romney went through to convince Republicans he was in complete agreement with them and had renounced his prior hints of moderation? Trump doesn't bother with that. Who cares what I said then? This is what I'm saying now, and anyone who has a problem with it is a low-energy loser.
(Excerpt) Read more at theweek.com ...
I hope that should have had a /s beside it.
The GOP has already betrayed the GOP.
Reagan never ran to the left.
Reagan never ran a campaign in the Age of Kardashian.
For a man or woman who has lost their main source of income, your list means nothing. Not a priority.
Every career politician is in the pockets of their ultra-rich donors. Even the constitutional conservative, sadly. All career politicians will keep pushing the cheap labor express. Export jobs to cheap labor countries and import cheap foreign labor....every one of them!
Path to Legal Status for Illegals
Cheap Foreign Workers on H1-B visa
Pushing import of Syrian Refugees:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=7-nLXGoSjpg
Your pic in #121 is also funny. But he is pointing at —your nose baddog, lol.
Bad analogy. Ronald Reagan nor Abraham Lincoln could have defeated Roosevelt in 1942 after Pearl Harbor.
The current GOP which includes John Boehner, Mitch McConnell, Paul Ryan, or Marco Rubio.....
Headline: Can You Handle the Truth? Ted and Heidi Cruz and the North American Union
April, 2015
Editorâ€TMs Note: Anyone who simply wants to anoint Ted Cruz as the next great conservative, without first vetting him, is part of the problem we have in this country, at least in my humble opinion. Those of us who refuse to admit that we have been fooled before are simply in denial. For the record I like Ted Cruz. I do, however, have some questions about him including his eligibility. A couple of weeks ago we ran a never before seen interview with Cruz in which he clearly stated that Heidiâ€TMs involvement with the Council on Foreign Relations was a matter of her joining as a voice of dissent. After reading the below article you can decide whether or not you believe his words. -Dean Garrison, DC Clothesline Editor
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) met his wife, Heidi (nee Nelson), while working on the George W. Bush presidential campaign of 2000. Heidi Cruz is currently head of the Southwest Region in the Investment Management Division of Goldman, Sachs & Co. and previously worked in the White House for Condoleezza Rice and in New York as an investment banker for J.P. Morgan. Wikipedia lists Heidi Nelson Cruz as an investment banker and a historical member of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).
Heidi Cruz was a member of the CFR-sponsored Independent Task Force on the Future of North America, which was launched in October 2004. The Task Force advocates a greater economic and social integration between Canada, Mexico, and the United States as a North American region.
Comprised of a group of prominent business, political and academic leaders from the U.S., Canada and Mexico, the Task Force was organized and sponsored by the Council on Foreign Relations (U.S.), the Canadian Council of Chief Executives, and the Mexican Council on Foreign Relations. It was co-chaired by former Canadian Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance, John Manley, former Finance Minister of Mexico, Pedro Aspe, and former Governor of Massachusetts and Assistant U.S. Attorney General William F. Weld.
Its main publication is the 70-page Task Force Report #53 entitled, Building a North American Community (May 2005). Heidi Cruz is listed as a member of the Task Force (page 9 of the report in PDF) and described as an energy investment banker with Merrill Lynch in Houston, Texas who served in the Bush White House under Dr. Condoleezza Rice as the Economic Director for the Western Hemisphere at the National Security Council, as the Director of the Latin America Office at the U.S. Treasury Department, and as Special Assistant to Ambassador Robert B. Zoellick, U.S. Trade Representative.
Task Force on North America Union members
The Report TMs recommendations include (see pp. 7-32 of the Report; pp. 29-54 of the PDF):
1. ESTABLISH A COMMON SECURITY PERIMETER BY 2010
The governments of Canada, Mexico, and the United States should articulate as their long-term goal a common security perimeter for North America. In particular, the three governments should strive toward a situation in which a terrorist trying to penetrate our borders will have an equally hard time doing so, no matter which country he elects to enter first.
2. DEVELOP A NORTH AMERICAN BORDER PASS
The three countries should develop a secure North American Border Pass with biometric identifiers. This document would allow its bearers expedited passage through customs, immigration, and airport security throughout the region.
3. DEVELOP A UNIFIED NORTH AMERICAN BORDER ACTION PLAN
Specific recommendations under this plan include:
Harmonize visa and asylum regulations, including convergence of the list of visa waiver countries;
Harmonize entry screening and tracking procedures for people, goods, and vessels (including integration of name-based and biometric watch lists);
By 2010, Lay the groundwork for the freer flow of people within North America. The three governments should commit themselves to the long-term goal of dramatically diminishing the need for the current intensity of the governments physical control of cross-border traffic, travel, and trade within North America. A long-term goal for a North American border action plan should be . . . the elimination of most controls over the temporary movement of these travelers within North America.
4. LAW ENFORCEMENT AND MILITARY COOPERATION
Security cooperation among the three countries should also extend to cooperation on counterterrorism and law enforcement, which would include the establishment of a trinational threat intelligence center, the development of trinational ballistics and explosives registration, and joint training for law enforcement officials.
Note: Now In beginning to get why U.S. police departments are hiring non-US citizens as officers!
5. SPREAD THE BENEFITS OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
NAFTA has transformed Mexico, but it has also deepened and made much more visible the divisions that exist in the country. The gap in wages has led many Mexicans to travel north in search of higher incomes and better opportunities. For the past three decades, Mexico has been the largest source of legal immigrants to the United States, and Mexican-Americans make increasingly valued and growing contributions to the life of the United States and, through remittances, to their families at home. Mexico is also the leading source of unauthorized migration, with attendant economic and security problems in both countries and untold hardships for Mexican migrants. Over time, the best way to diminish these problems is by promoting better economic opportunities in Mexico.
Note: In other words, more socialist spread the wealth !
6. ESTABLISH A SEAMLESS NORTH AMERICAN MARKET FOR TRADE
With tariff barriers virtually eliminated, and the outlines of a North American economy visible, the time has come to take a more comprehensive approach to strengthening the economic prospects for citizens in all three countries. The first step is to encourage convergence in the most-favored-nation tariff rates each partner charges on imports from outside North America. Next, the governments should reduce the remaining nontariff barriers to the flow of goods and services, and address problems arising from charges of price discrimination and subsidization by competitors in North America. Finally, they should coordinate their approach to unfair trade practices by foreign suppliers to the North American market. The ultimate goal should be to create a seamless market for suppliers and consumers throughout North America.
7. INCREASE LABOR MOBILITY WITHIN NORTH AMERICA
To make the most of the impressive pool of skill and talent within North America, the three countries should look beyond the NAFTA visa system. The large volume of undocumented migrants from Mexico within the United States is an urgent matter for those two countries to address. A long-term goal should be to create a North American preference new rules thatwould make it much easier for employees to move and for employers to recruit across national boundaries within the continent. Canada and the United States should consider eliminating restrictions on labor mobility altogether and work toward solutions that, in the long run, could enable the extension of full labor mobility to Mexico as well.
Specifics on how to create a North American free flow of labor include:
By 2010, streamline immigration and labor mobility rules to enable citizens of all three countries to work elsewhere in North America with far fewer restrictions than immigrants from other countries.
Special immigration status should be given to teachers, faculty, and students in the region.
Move to full labor mobility between Canada and the United States†by eliminating all remaining barriers to the ability of their citizens to live and work in the other country.
8. NORTH AMERICAN POLITICAL INSTITUTIONS
The Task Force recommends the following North American regional political institutions be established:
An annual North American summit meeting.
A North American Advisory Council.
A North American Inter-Parliamentary Group to meet every other year.
In the last part of the Task Force report, Additional and Dissenting Views,Heidi S. Cruz wrote (pp. 33-34):
I support the Task Force report and its recommendations aimed at building a safer and more prosperous North America. Economic prosperity and a world safe from terrorism and other security threats are no doubt inextricably linked. While governments play an invaluable role in both regards, we must emphasize the imperative that economic investment be led and perpetuated by the private sector. There is no force proven like the market for aligning incentives, sourcing capital, and producing results like financial markets and profit-making businesses. This is simply necessary to sustain a higher living standard for the poorest among us—truly the measure of our success. As such, investment funds and financing mechanisms should be deemed attractive instruments by those committing the capital and should only be developed in conjunction with market participants.
Now you know why, despite his blustering against Obamas executive amnesty for millions of illegal aliens in this country, on March 27, 2015, Ted Cruz indicated he remains open to a path to legal status for undocumented workers.
Born in Canada of an American citizen mother and a Cuban father, Ted Cruz held dual Canadian-U.S. citizenship. But it was only when the Dallas Morning News in August 2013 pointed out his dual citizenship that Cruz finally applied to renounce his Canadian citizenship which meant that in 2012 when Cruz had run for and was elected a U.S. senator, he was a Canadian citizen. On May 14, 2014, Cruz finally ceased being a citizen of Canada. See Republican Sen. Ted Cruz announces presidential campaign, but is he eligible?
—
True. I guess I’m among a dwindling number of troglodytes who still believe an unapologetic conservative candidate can still convince voters and win.
Based on his own words and actions and past positions.
“I did what I had to do”
“I was a businessmanâ€
“If you can’t get rich dealing with politicians, there’s something wrong with you.â€
Then he was “very pro-choice†-> Now he is “pro-life”
He has flip flopped on taxes.
In 2000 he was for Gun control...now he’s against it.
Trump was for universal healthcare...now he is against it.
Trump “likes” someone until he doesn’t...then they are the devil.
Same thing will happen with his supporters.
EXCUSE me!!! Trump has NEVER been a candidate BEFORE!!!
Are you forgetting this is his first time in running for an office of OUR government? Did you just crawl out of your hole this morning and realize this is 2016???
WOW, with people like this voting no wonder America is the way it is...
The fact is liberals will NEVER vote against the Democrat. The only way to win is to excite your base and turn them out, not to try this nonsense of "winning over Democrats." That's how Obama won, by exciting the base, not by "winning over Republicans." The core Republican base is Christian conservatives, the group Trump does the worst with.
Building buildings in Large Cities.... wow, shocking, you have to grease the skids of the local politicians to get things done.... That’s how the game is played, for good or ill. Holding that against him is a dubious argument... Would you prefer he avoided such things and was ineffective?
Yes I would. Hobby Lobby and Chick-Fil-A risk going out of business by standing up for their Judeo-Christian values. They don't cut a check to Dems and keep quiet on their faith just to increase their profits.
I couldn't care less how "smart" Trump is. Lots of liberal billionaires are smart. You can be evil and smart...that's where the term "evil genius" came from.
Go over to a website like reddit.com where the kids hang out. It’s just brutal. Groupthink fascism on display as “normal”.
And every Trumpkin like you has NO explanation why Trump does worse than Cruz against Hillary/Sanders in EVERY POLL. Only Bush does as bad as Trump in these polls. You people just choose to ignore the only hard facts we have on the general election electability.
Many people who have known Trump for years say he is who he’s always been. Changed some positions but not core beliefs. Always hated abortion,
<><><><
So when he said he was prochoice in these youtube videos he was lying?
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=trump+interview+prochoice
yes he is GOPe .. “deal maker” He loves to make deals just to do so.. many of them do not work and has left investors to hold the bag, not an issue as that is part of the deal with investors its a risk. As a president the risk is a lot bigger and not as easy to avoid.
Wake up, Trumpkin. Ever hear of Soros and the Koch brothers? When you have billions, you can fund and fight for conservative or liberal causes. Trump never used his power to fight for our cause. He’s selling you a line of BS just to get the power and status of the presidency to satisfy his own ego.
’d rather give Trump one chance to betray me than give the GOP their 17th.”
Cruz won’t betray you.
Absolutely, Trump is the biggest Conman we have ever seen in American Politics.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.