[don-o]

It decries the fact that the GOPe and NRO apparently have given up on persuasion and moved on into insulting coercion.

It was not my intent to insult. Please forgive me.

Now, do Trump's flip flops that are set out in the article have any relevance as to his fitness for high office?

I understand the anger against NRO. But, must that preclude actual discussion of an article with clearly stated and well argued points of objection?

[MortMan]

You are certainly forgiven - While I may indulge in pointing out that particular error, I have to also admit I sometimes find myself falling into the same pit.

Now, I am aware of a lot of facts about Trump. Some of them are OK to me, others bothersome.

But I will not and cannot countenance using such a shrill article that actively insults anyone who doesn’t agree with the author’s conclusion as a basis for rational discussion. NRO has leaped into the maelstrom, yet they want people to continue to heed their words, screamed in defiance of the wind.