They were armed anarchists. How long would you have tolerated them if they were on property next door to you, but not these nuts, but rather the Black Lives Matter crowd demanding your property as payment for slavery.
Are you referring to these people or to the Occupy movement?
That’s different. Those are individual citizens > individual citizens. This is individual citizens > GOVERNMENT(The ones supposedly there to protect your rights, my rights, Bundy’s rights). If you had bothered to read up on the issues surrounding the Oregon situation you would know that the Ranchers had served PRISON sentences, came home, and some time later were told to go back to PRISON for another few YEARS for the same charge. The Feds were/are blatantly trying to seize the land. I don’t know how legitimate the claims are about minerals and uranium deposits being located on the land, however those men staging this did not seem unreasonable, raging, violent, or unwilling to accept compromise.
All the Feds had to do if they aren’t at fault is to release all the documents to the public and launch an investigation. Nope. Because there is surely SOMETHING that proves the feds are in the wrong. Otherwise, why not negotiate? No one is being harmed.
The people in the truck were surely recording the entire incident. The FBI/GOV are in the wrong on this one. Dead wrong.
If it is proved that the FBI shot first unprovoked will Oath’s be kept?
Nice to hear from the law and order faction of FR, coming up with a bogus analogy to support the status quot of of a strong federal government. I’ve had more difficulties with the government than I’ve ever had from an anarchist.
Like Bill Ayers?