That’s different. Those are individual citizens > individual citizens. This is individual citizens > GOVERNMENT(The ones supposedly there to protect your rights, my rights, Bundy’s rights). If you had bothered to read up on the issues surrounding the Oregon situation you would know that the Ranchers had served PRISON sentences, came home, and some time later were told to go back to PRISON for another few YEARS for the same charge. The Feds were/are blatantly trying to seize the land. I don’t know how legitimate the claims are about minerals and uranium deposits being located on the land, however those men staging this did not seem unreasonable, raging, violent, or unwilling to accept compromise.
All the Feds had to do if they aren’t at fault is to release all the documents to the public and launch an investigation. Nope. Because there is surely SOMETHING that proves the feds are in the wrong. Otherwise, why not negotiate? No one is being harmed.
The people in the truck were surely recording the entire incident. The FBI/GOV are in the wrong on this one. Dead wrong.
If it is proved that the FBI shot first unprovoked will Oath’s be kept?
That will be my question ... Will the oather's be keepers or breakers ... I sincerely hope for the former.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3387693/posts?page=1#1
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3387861/posts?page=1#1
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3389065/posts?page=6#6
“If it is proved that the FBI shot first unprovoked will Oath’s be kept?”
That’s my question as well.