Cringing Negativism Network: I don't believe this article.
This is a Ted Cruz troll in my opinion.
Candor7: John Hawkins the poofter!
Allahwaho Wackbar , John.
Helicondelta: This article is a load of crap.
John Hawkins sounds like a liar.
Pravious: Ditto. It's not even that well disguised. Just more anti-Trump trolling.
All I can say is POUND SAND, LOSER.
So let's examine the responses. Do we have any rebuttal? Any reasons why this opinion is wrong? Any evidence or experience that shows why Trump will govern to the right? Nope.
Instead, we get ad hominem attacks on the author, on Ted Cruz, and on "Cruz-supporters," none of whom had even POSTED up to that point. No reason, no explanation, just vitriol. Vitriol directed (once again) at people who have been conservative bastions in the past (like Cruz, Mark Levin, Rush, et al.), but, because they dare doubt Trump, they must be destroyed (not disagreed with, not persuaded, not contradicted... but persoanlly attacked and destroyed)! This is conservative?
I won't vote for Jeb (why bother; he's the same as a Democrat), but I'll vote for any Republican candidate to beat Hillary or Bernie. But I had very little enthusiasm for Mitt, and I think a lot of people who pulled the lever for him felt the same way. It showed in his defeat. How many people will Trump get to enthusiastically campaign for him after his supporters attack and denigrate those very people because they disagree?
I'll vote for Trump. But if we have to tear down everyone who has gotten conservatism to this point in order to do so... what have we "won"...?
I modified my opinion based on later feedback.
But I still think this post has an agenda.
However the author seems sincere.
Wrong. But sincere. :D
Your duplicity is appalling. This thread is FULL of rebuttals.
"Cherry-picking" is does not help your original, fallacious assertion.
Post of the day, which could apply to every single political thread.
One trick ponies are mildly amusing. They quickly become boring and it goes all downhill from there.