[Cringing Negativism Network]

I modified my opinion based on later feedback.

But I still think this post has an agenda.

However the author seems sincere.

Wrong. But sincere. :D

[Charles H. (The_r0nin)]

I modified my opinion based on later feedback.

Fair enough. It still does show a disturbing trend of attack venomously first, consider later, though. And that's the point I'm making. As my dear departed grandmother used to say, "You catch more flies with honey than with vinegar."

But I still think this post has an agenda.

I'm not sure what that means. All posts have an "agenda." The O.P. seems to have an agenda explaining why he is no longer supporting Trump as his first choice. My post has the agenda to point out the dangers of tearing down those who got you where you are now, and who you hope to support you in the future. Your post has the "agenda" of defending Trump from criticism (and originally) to cast aspersions on the motives of the author of the article. So what? None of those agendas are invalid. It's the results of the actions that matter.