Mark Levin Show,M-F,6PM-9PM,EST,WABC AM,January 25,2016

Mark Levin Show ^ | January 25,2016 | Mark Levin

[Biggirl]

I cannot understand why there is this so-called “conservative purity” stuff going on.

[sloop]

depends on which week you ask him

he evolves more than hitlery

[Biggirl]

Sadly, because Sen. Cruz has NO CHANCE.

[bray]

Sure you shouldn’t be voting for Bernie Sanders? He seems to have the same economic philosophy.

[sloop]

correct

[chris37]

Then lets ask the consistent conservative, Ted Cruz, what kind of RINO votes for the Corker Bill, because I’d really like to know.

[TornadoAlley3]

I will proudly vote for Cruz or Trump. I will hold my nose for rest. I will encourage others to do same. I cannot support anyone who says they are conservative but will vote for Sanders if their guy does not win. Stay home if you must. But Sanders? Levin is ok with that. Good to know. I love Mark, but I am so sad he is ok with that.

[sloop]

that one’s hill to die on is building a wall

trump said he would - but next week that will change

[SE Mom]

I think so too.

I cannot abide Glenn Beck. For endless reasons. It was not a smart thing for Cruz to associate himself with him. Why Mark is defending Beck is beyond me.

[sloop]

you are the one excusing trump - because he made money

money is your god

not mine

[GraceG]

Everyone talking about ethanol are missing the point, here is the point:

The way to address ethanol is not JUST to CUT SUBSIDIES, but explain that the government does just as much to LIMIT ethanol production as it does to SUBSIDIZE IT.

Cut the subsidy, cut the regulation as well, and see how it does in the FREE MARKET.

So much of what the government does is both Subsidizing things while regulating things...

This needs to be explained better.

Government LIMITING something while subsidizing that same something only helps the "Big Boys" and scrwews over the free enterprise of the small and mid level producers.

Ethanol is a symptom of worse behavior in government, creating a problem so they can fund a solution so the peopel in power can launder money/power and vice versa for their OWN ENDS.

[sloop]

trump would have - at least in the next 10 minutes

depending on the wind direction

[Irenic]

He’s consistent, I love that.

[LucyT]

Over the weekend, a twitter post stated Mark Levin's fiance's son is a full time staffer for Ted Cruz.

[sloop]

wind direction and how much money is in it for him

[chris37]

Ted Cruz did.

[sloop]

so that is a push

next

[beandog]

My son pointed out that Mark doesn’t do his show for money, fame or to be on the radio. He does it to try and educate people about the country and conservatism. I think he is very passionate about both.

[beandog]

Yes, we know that. So what.

[Democratic-Republican]

like donating to democrapz - I mean - ALL conservatives do that

I've always found this curious. That implies we only trust those who only donate to (R) candidates. And since we have practically zero good (R) politicians, you are effectively asking for those who only donate to RINOs. Because that is who makes up 99% of the (R).

I also don't see how donating to both parties is a bad thing in the GENERAL election when you need to court the (D) and (L) along with the (R) and (C). Trump gets to highlight the fact he was non-partisan. Don't you think that is an asset?

Finally it is just pocket change. Let's say that you sloop are a millionaire on paper ( house, assets, etc ). Okay? We'll assign Trump a value of 5 billion which is probably low. That places him at a 5000x multiplier relative to your wealth.

When he donated $60,000 to (D)ummycrats in 2006 that was the equivalent to you donating $12 ( twelve dollars! ).

In 2012 when he donated $290,000 to the (R)INOcrats, that was the equivalent to you donating $58 ( fifty-eight dollars! ).

So this is what's got your dander up? Really?

Those donations are picked off this graph I found in this thread ...