Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: exnavy
No. It is you that are mistaken.

Vattel's rightings were heavily relied on and we have seen the references in too many threads already. Born on American soil to two citizen parents.

The first immigration act was passed by our First Congress in 1790. In chapter III is Vattel's assertion that citizenship is derived from the father, in that citizenship was prohibited to children whose fathers have never gave intent to permanently reside of the United States.

In this same act, we also find the clarification of a Natural Born Citizen, as being one "And the children of citizens of the United States, that may be born beyond sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born citizens: Provided, That the right of citizenship shall not descend to persons whose fathers have never been a resident in the United States:"

Residency was defined in that same act as someone under oath declaring that they wished to remain and live in the Untied States.

Cruz was born under the jurisdiction of Canada. His father was under the jurisdiction of Canada. Because his mother was most likely an American citizen at the time he was entitled to become an American citizen by statute but he was not born an American citizen, it had to be adjudged. Furthermore his father had not fulfilled the condition of residency.

167 posted on 01/25/2016 11:15:36 AM PST by JayGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]


To: JayGalt

No, that is BS.


179 posted on 01/25/2016 11:26:58 AM PST by exnavy (good gun control: two hands, one shot, one kill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson