Posted on 01/22/2016 2:30:23 PM PST by Rennes Templar
A furious backlash is building against the full-on attack by some conservative leaders led by the National Review on leading Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump.
A woman in southern California who supports Trump posted a video overnight that has captured the mood of many Trump supporters fed up with being lectured and condescended to about what it means to be “conservative.â€
Kambree Nelson, a businesswoman dedicated to supporting veterans and helping the homeless, recorded the 10:48 stream of consciousness rant after watching the Kelly File on Fox News feature guests from the National Review hit team against Trump trash her candidate–and by extension his supporters. The Trump-bashing panel consisted of Dana Loesch, Brent Bozell and Katie Pavlich.
Nelson titled the video “I am LIVID at the GOPâ€. Speaking about the video on her Twitter account, Nelson called herself “one ANGRY American.â€
Nelson says in the beginning of the video:
“…I am one of the noisy majority and I am one of the people that is voting for Donald Trump. And guess what GOP, and guess what Tea Party, I am a conservative.
“And what you guys said up there tonight was completely offensive to me. I never knew that there was a handbook that we had to abide by to be considered conservative to vote in this next election. Do I have to come to a tea party to be able to be considered considerate–and to be conservative.
“It was astonishing to me tonight. Why are we having these elections if the election has to be based upon what you guys say? Who is voting, you or the People voting?…â€
Nelson is set to be a host on the upcoming Veterans TV Network in June.
What is nonsensical is your assumption about whom I support.
I call out Trump on his policies, and am told "Like Karl, you are deaf to what is happening amongst conservative voters."
It's not my job to clarify your position, or to ask about it. I go by what is said.
Thanks.
It’s a funny title, I like it.
But it’s a bit wordy and rambling. I’m not sure what the author is trying to say.
I think your five year ago impression of Trump is right.
I say this as one who did support Trump, especially a Trump-Cruz ticket, until just recently.
no - you go by what you want to screech about. What you did is repeat the same tired old gop party line we have grown tired of over the last several election cycles. Displaying the same tin ear I was commenting about. My posts were all about the gop and NR stupidity....It is not my job to teach you to read with understanding.
You probably should stop inferring, you’re not very good at it.
I only addressed the posts you directed at me, and yes, I only talk about what I want to talk about.
If my inference was wrong, I don't care. Which candidate you support is less important to me than Lena Dunham's sex habits. You can go pound sand for all I care.
You continue to make unfounded and unsupportable assumptions. But you falsely claim not to care.
You should probably go a step farther and only talk about what you want, and are capable, to talk about. Then you wouldn’t respond to my posts. You don’t have the horses to pull the load.
BTW - by your responses, you OBVIOUSLY care who I support: Apathy does not make inferences nor assumptions.
Nope again, don’t care.
Here’s the answers to the ‘hard questions’ about Trump:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gw8c2Cq-vpg&feature=autoshare
Buzz off, you don’t have the mental horsepower to even be amusing.
Look, vote for whoever you want to. I don't friggin' care, and neither does anyone else.
If you don’t care, then stop bothering me!
I repeat, even though you have shown you are unable to grasp the concept:
If you don’t care, you wouldn’t be so eager to make assumptions.
You’re welcome!
If you don't like being bothered, then perhaps you shouldn't haved pinged me with your wild-eyed GOP apocalypticism, all while pretending that I care what you think.
These SOB’s NEVER said Romnwy, McCain, Dole wasn’t conservative enough I am as angry as this lady I live in CA boarders are HUGE problem it is just like living in Mexico ! God Bless her!
Yes, I pointed out the error of your series of NR covers to refute another poster.
I was under no illusions that you would want to be corrected. But it was you who tried to use the faulty argument to make your point, and so you threw your hissy fit at me for upsetting your shaky applecart.
I did not anticipate the smallness of your mind nor the shallowness of your reasoning.
I have since filed your screen name in my “doesn’t understand discussion, logic or debate” file.
The post I was replying to said that the authors cited in the cover story “never attacked Obama”. This is provably untrue, and my point stands unrefuted by your incoherent ramblings.
Your stupid cover examples all came AFTER (do you understand that big word?) Obama was elected. There is a big difference - but your knife isn’t sharp enough to understand that.
Even if he did say that, that's easily debunked by simply looking at the archives of the writers.
For the last several years I’ve been forced to hold my nose and vote for a false-Conservative.
I still think Cruz would be a better President but a Trump victory would do more to slay the Beast that threatens civilization, i.e. Political Correctness.
You are such a foolish child. It was said, you attempted to debunk it with your irrelevant covers. I pointed out the irrelevance of your post. You wet your panties in a hissy fit.
Basic rule of analogy: like to like in relevant details. Timing of negative stories is very relevant. You stupidly used all post election articles to TRY to make your point.
It is not my fault you are unable to make a cogent argument. I was not supporting Trump - as you stupidly assumed - just pointing out the deficits in your childish argument...and you defend your original childish argument with more childish arguments.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.