This is a great commentary. Thank you! I think that the National Review’s actions point up the crux of the problem. The want, wishes, opinions and will of the real American people, the ordinary, working class, law abiding citizen, the kind that is flocking by the thousands to hear plain spoken Trump; are being dismissed and belittled by the “political intellectuals” who think that their purpose is to tell us what to think. After all, what would common folk know about government and it’s complexities?
The National Review’s actions have offended me highly because they have, as you have said, needlessly attacked my choice of Trump for the nomination as emotionally and mindlessly made, the same kind of pompous derision I’ve received from a few on here.
Donald Trump has already performed things that will garner my respect from now on. He has ripped back a many a curtain and exposed ugliness that was hidden. This is just another case in point.
Amen to that!
Well said, couldn’t agree more.
If I may, here's an excerpt from Origins of the American Revolution by John C. Miller which I believe parallels your observations:
"The American Revolution was one of the first great popular movements in which the newspapers played a vital part: 'The PRESS hath never done greater Service since its first Invention,' exclaimed an American patriot, as he surveyed the wonders wrought by propaganda. The newspapers kept the people in alarm for their liberties and made the controversy between mother country and colonies a great popular crusade in which every American could take part. The Tories groaned that by dint of reading newspapers, even 'the peasants and their housewives in every part of the land were able to dispute on politics and positively to determine upon our liberties."