Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cboldt

Are federal judges trying to cite foreign law now? Elena

Kagan — was she the one who said we should do more of that?


188 posted on 01/25/2016 4:35:50 AM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March (Cruz and Trump FRiends strongest when we don't insult each other.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies ]


To: Arthur Wildfire! March
-- Are federal judges trying to cite foreign law now? --

They have to for rendering decisions on certain types of multi-national citizenship cases.

8 USC 1409 - Children born out of wedlock

while the person is under the age of 18 years ... the person is legitimated under the law of the person's residence or domicile
For a person born abroad, out of wedlock, the case can turn on the law of the person's residence or domicile, which is typically a foreign country. There is a big body of case law on 1409.
189 posted on 01/25/2016 4:46:25 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies ]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March
-- Are federal judges trying to cite foreign law now? --

I'd add that even 1401 includes, but does not recite, that the marriage be one that is recognized in the country of birth. If the marriage isn't recognized, then the birth is out of wedlock, and 1409 applies. That doesn't mean citizenship does not attach, only that the analysis proceeds under a different law.

191 posted on 01/25/2016 4:51:13 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson