So.. you agree totally with the article?
You have NO POV of your own?
RE: You have NO POV of your own?
1) I can agree with certain points of an article and disagree with others.
2) If I whole heartedly agree with the article, then they articulate my point of view.
Let’s take this statement from the article:
The Tea Party used to be about “fiscal responsibility, constitutionally limited government, and free markets.” Now, the movement’s top media darling has enthusiastically endorsed a man who built his wealth on eminent domain and seeks to “make America great again” by restricting trade. Trump is a crony capitalist of the kind tea partiers once lamented in the wake of TARP and the big corporate bailouts.
I AGREE with the issue of eminent domain ( Trump supports it ), I am not certain though if Trump wants to restrict trade. He did say he was for FAIR TRADE, which is a concept that he hasn’t defined in detail.
As for the bailouts, Trump was all over the place.
At times, he said it would be better if it passed, then he would later add that he has some doubts as to its effectiveness.
So, in effect Palin shifted from being a solid Tea Partier to a supporter of a waffler.