Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
To: SeekAndFind
54 posted on
01/18/2016 8:57:02 PM PST by
GraceG
(The election doesn't pick the next president, it is an audition for "American Emperor"...)
To: SeekAndFind
When Secretary Of States refuse to put Cruz on ballot because they believe he is ineligible, then Cruz will be in panic to sue them but not likely he will have time. Just dumb dumb dumb!
61 posted on
01/18/2016 9:04:42 PM PST by
free_life
(If you ask Jesus to forgive you and to save you, He will.)
To: SeekAndFind
80 posted on
01/18/2016 9:38:29 PM PST by
catnipman
(Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
To: SeekAndFind
It was Settled in 1790 and AGAIN in 1802!
In 1798, the law on naturalization was changed again.
The Federalists feared that many new immigrants favored their political foes, the Democratic-Republicans.
The Federalists, therefore, wanted to reduce the political influence of immigrants.
To do so, the Federalists, who controlled Congress, passed a lawthat required immigrants to wait fourteen years before becoming naturalized citizens and thereby gaining the right to vote.
The 1798 act also barred naturalization for citizens of countries at war with the United States.
At the time, the United States was engaged in an unofficial, undeclared naval war with France.
The French government thought the United States had taken the side of Britain in the ongoing conflict between Britain and France.
A related law passed in 1798, the Alien Enemy Act, gave the president the power during a time of war to arrest or deport any alien thought to be a danger to the government.
After Jefferson became president (in 1801), the 1798 naturalization law was repealed, or overturned (in 1802).
The basic provisions of the original 1790 law WERE RESTORED except for the period of residency before naturalization.The residency requirement, that is, the amount of time the immigrant had to reside, or live, in the United States, was put back to five years, as it had been in 1795.
The 1802 law remained the basic naturalization act until 1906, with two notable exceptions.In 1855, the wives of American citizens were automatically granted citizenship.
In 1870, people of African descent could become naturalized citizens, in line with constitutional amendments passed after the American Civil War (1861-65)that banned slavery and gave African American men the right to vote.
Other laws were passed to limit the number of people (if any) allowed to enter the United States from different countries,especially Asian countries, but these laws did not affect limits on naturalization.
Within a decade of adopting the Constitution, immigration, and naturalization in particular, had become hot political issues.
They have remained political issues for more than two centuries.
Did you know ...
Naturalization laws relate to the process of immigrants becoming a citizen.
Other laws have provided for losing citizenship -- by getting married!
In 1907, Congress passed a law that said a woman born in the United States (and therefore a citizen) would lose her citizenshipif she married an alien (who was therefore not a citizen).
In 1922, two years after women won the right to vote,this provision was repealed and a woman's citizenship status was separated from her husband's.
Also Notice the signature blocks at the bottom of this:
1st United States Congress, 21-26 Senators and 59-65 Representatives
So READ THE LATEST FROM the
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), the government agency that oversees lawful immigration to the United States.
And
what's YOUR source, some COMMUNIST COLLEGE PROFESSOR ? READ IT AGAIN, KNOT-HEAD !
Constitutional Topic: Citizenship
... Citizenship is mentioned in
If you're going to be involved in government in the United States, citizenship is a must.
To be a Senator or Representative, you must be a citizen of the United States.
To be President, not only must you be a citizen, but you must also be natural-born.
Aside from participation in government, citizenship is an honor bestowed upon people by the citizenry of the United States when a non-citizen passes the required tests and submits to an oath.
Natural-born citizen
Who is a natural-born citizen?
Who, in other words, is a citizen at birth, such that that person can be a President someday?
The 14th Amendment defines citizenship this way:"All persons born or naturalized in the United States,and subject to the jurisdiction thereof,
are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."
But even this does not get specific enough.
As usual, the Constitution provides the framework for the law, but it is the law that fills in the gaps.
The Constitution authorizes the Congress to do create clarifying legislation inalso allows the Congress to create law regarding naturalization,
Currently, Title 8 of the U.S. Code fills in the gaps left by the Constitution.
Section 1401 defines the following as people who are "citizens of the United States at birth:"
- Anyone born inside the United States *
* There is an exception in the law - - the person must be "subject to the jurisdiction" of the United States.
This would exempt the child of a diplomat, for example, from this provision.
- Any Indian or Eskimo born in the United States, provided being a citizen of the U.S. does not impair the person's status as a citizen of the tribe
- Any one born outside the United States, both of whose parents are citizens of the U.S., as long as one parent has lived in the U.S.
li>Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year and the other parent is a U.S. national
- Any one born in a U.S. possession, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year
- Any one found in the U.S. under the age of five, whose parentage cannot be determined, as long as proof of non-citizenship is not provided by age 21
- Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is an alien and as long as the other parent is a citizen of the U.S. who lived in the U.S. for at least five years (with military and diplomatic service included in this time)
A final, historical condition: a person born before 5/24/1934 of an alien father and a U.S. citizen mother who has lived in the U.S.
Anyone falling into these categories is considered natural-born, and is eligible to run for President or Vice President.
These provisions allow the children of military families to be considered natural-born, for example.
Separate sections handle territories that the United States has acquired over time, such asEach of these sections confer citizenship on persons living in these territories as of a certain date,
and usually confer natural-born status on persons born in those territories after that date.For example, for Puerto Rico, all persons born in Puerto Rico between April 11, 1899, and January 12, 1941, are automatically conferred citizenship as of the date the law was signed by the President (June 27, 1952).
Additionally, all persons born in Puerto Rico on or after January 13, 1941, are natural-born citizens of the United States.Note that because of when the law was passed, for some, the natural-born status was retroactive.
The law contains one other section of historical note, concerning the Panama Canal Zone and the nation of Panama.
In 8 USC 1403, the law states thatanyone born in the Canal Zone or in Panama itself, on or after February 26, 1904, to a mother and/or father who is a United States citizen,
was "declared" to be a United States citizen.Note that the terms "natural-born" or "citizen at birth" are missing from this section.
In 2008, when Arizona Senator John McCain ran for president on the Republican ticket, some theorized thatbecause McCain was born in the Canal Zone,
he was not actually qualified to be president.
However, it should be noted that section 1403 was written to apply to a small group of people to whom section 1401 did not apply.
McCain is a natural-born citizen under 8 USC 1401(c):"a person born outside of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents both of whom are citizens of the United States
and one of whom has had a residence in the United States or one of its outlying possessions, prior to the birth of such person."
Not everyone agrees that this section includes McCain - - but absent a court ruling either way, we must presume citizenship.
U.S. Nationals
A "national" is a person who is considered under the legal protection of a country, while not necessarily a citizen.
National status is generally conferred on persons who lived in places acquired by the U.S. before the date of acquisition.
A person can be a national-at-birth under a similar set of rules for a natural-born citizen.
U.S. nationals must go through the same processes as an immigrant to become a full citizen.
U.S. nationals who become citizens are not considered natural-born.
(Continued
And
what's YOUR source, some COMMUNIST COLLEGE PROFESSOR ?
103 posted on
01/18/2016 10:38:20 PM PST by
Yosemitest
(It's SIMPLE ! ... Fight, ... or Die !)
To: SeekAndFind
"As a legal matter, the question is quite straightforward and settled law," Cruz has said. That's bullsqueeze, and you know it, Ted.
Or maybe you're not the constitutional scholar and champion so many of us took you for, when we busted our tails to get you elected to the Senate.
Ted is so losing my patience and trust over this. Armchair students of American history and the Constitution appear to have a keener grasp of what the Framers' original intent was, than Ted Cruz.
Anyone over 40 likely was taught in school that American presidents are required to be born on US soil to two US citizen parents. That's how the general public has understood the NBC clause for generations - right back to the founding of the nation.
Seems weird that over 200 years of precedent and understanding about something so basic to the fundamental structure of our government, has now become such a mysterious question. Obama got away with violating the spirit (if not the very letter) of the Constitution, so why not Cruz too?
It's hypocritical to say that Zero is ineligible if he was born out of country to one US citizen parent, but Cruz is not.
112 posted on
01/18/2016 11:05:40 PM PST by
Windflier
(Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
To: SeekAndFind
A true conservative would want to preserve and uphold the Constitution and err on the side of caution by not voting for someone who is not eligible to be President.
Voting for Cruz and having him as President would weaken the Constitution.
116 posted on
01/18/2016 11:20:33 PM PST by
r_barton
("Trump" word origin "Triumph" - Merriam-Webster Dictionary)
Cruz’ birth right is not settled, by Global Warming is.
Screw the MSM. It’s the Country’s greatest threat.
135 posted on
01/19/2016 12:15:45 AM PST by
Gene Eric
(Don't be a statist!)
To: SeekAndFind
According to Ted Cruz’ logic, Barack Obama COULD have been born in Kenya...and still been eligible. I have a serious problem with that.
To: All
SOURCE: Calgary Sun.
208 posted on
01/19/2016 6:07:58 AM PST by
Liz
(SAFE PLACE? A liberal's mind. Nothing's there. Nothing can penetrate it.)
To: SeekAndFind
A handful of legal experts and Constitutional law scholars here have determined that Cruz is not eligible to be President of the United States. That settles it for me.
To: All
“Natural born” means you can’t have been born by caesarean section. You must have came down the “natural” canal. /s
Being sarcastic but I can see Sheila Jackson-Lee saying this.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson