LOL
I posted a rational explanation for why this is evil.
2 vs 2nd is not something worthy of trying to destroy someone over.
You couldn’t bite off on that, so you had to try to defend it.
Rational? Not hardly...
Nobody is trying to or going to destroy Trump over this. Free Republic is not a safe space for snowflakes.
You are better at debate than your comments on this thread would indicate. Buck up.
The only comments I made were to point out the proper title of the epistle and also to opine that the clunker would raise eyebrows among many folks that I know well. Does it make up / change minds? Who knows?
Kill shot? Not at all.
I then tried to bring in another aspect - pragmatism. And that got ignored.
Let me take a last try. Suppose President Trump is negotiating with Congress over say trade, while there is some prolife legislation in the works. Suppose Pelosi tells Donald she needs Planned Parenthood funding increased (Donald is already on record liking the good things they do) in exchange for supporting his 35 or 45% tariff on imports.
What is a reasonable expectation as to how that plays out?