I am disappointed in him ever supporting PARTIAL BIRTH abortion even if it dates back to ‘99. A sub-barbaric thing to support. Most politicians I would never forgive such a position even that long ago.
This one voter grants him a jubilee [and I never thought an exception regarding PARTIAL BIRTH infanticide would be possible].
But as for him admiring the Clintons in the past — that is clearly gone and buried. You watered down your argument adding that.
He recently said (from above):
When the Daily Caller’s Jamie Weinstein asked Trump if he would have become pro-life if that child had been a loser instead of a “total superstar,” Trump replied: “Probably not, but I’ve never thought of it. I would say no, but in this case it was an easy one because he’s such an outstanding person.”
So life and death is based on his judgement of a person being a “superstar” or “loser”. That is profoundly disturbing. So if more “losers” live in the future abortions are okay again?
What the hell kind of principles are those?
I have worked with other RN who did not know exactly what partial birth abortion was. It doesn’t surprise me that many in the general public are not clear on it. So the savagery continues.