Would Donald Trump Be a Pro-Abortion President?

The Weekly Standard ^ | January 17, 2016 | JOHN MCCORMACK

[Pravious]

“...The attack was more than a bit hypocritical because Trump himself was “very” pro-abortion not so long ago. In 1999....”

I didn’t need to read further than this. When you define “not so long ago” as seventeen years, nothing you say could possibly have any meaning.

I see the daily anti-Trump propaganda has started early today. Let’s see how many seminar Cruz-z-zer’s post today! :-)

[Elsie]

Are we really as idiotic as we seem????????

Well...

We've had...

People's Temple,
Mormonism,
Scientology,
Shakers,
bad popes,
Jehovan Witnesses,
ALIENS!!!
Jimmy Carter and Obama.

After all this reporting; what do you decide??

[anton]

Unless Trump is running for the Supreme Court, why would it matter?

[lodi90]

How many butchered babies has Ted Cruz saved? None. Zero. But he and his supporters doesn’t have a problem using them like political footballs. Hmmm. That’s exactly what the Dems do.

[Elsie]

Because you have killed 55 million Americans in the womb over the last 40 years.

It's a little higher now...

I'd like to thank the United States Government for protecting me and my kind.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

You see, 40 years ago, my odds of making it out of the egg, alive, were very poor; about 80% of us died. 

 (http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=rachel-carson-silent-spring-1972-ddt-ban-birds-thrive)

 

 

But a lady discovered our plight and wrote a book that addressed our problem,

and, in 1972, a law was ammended protecting us even further. (http://www.fws.gov/midwest/eagle/protect/laws.html)

 

 

 

 

 

 

What I find strange is that the same government passed a law the very next year that allowed for killing

of unborn, and apparently unwanted, humans.  Little ones still nestled safely in their Mother's womb.

Around 25% of them are dying before birth - on average nearly 3,300 - every day of the year.

 

 

I hear that by now, somewhere around 58 MILLION of them have perished.

Wouldn't that kind of mess up the humans plans for growth, and welfare, and

retirement?

 

 

 

 

 

Strange birds; these Homo Sapiens.  Perhaps they'll come to their senses

before they are ALL dead!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I'd like to thank the United States Government for protecting me and my kind.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

You see, 40 years ago, my odds of making it out of the egg, alive, were very poor; about 80% of us died. 

 (http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=rachel-carson-silent-spring-1972-ddt-ban-birds-thrive)

 

 

But a lady discovered our plight and wrote a book that addressed our problem,

and, in 1972, a law was ammended protecting us even further. (http://www.fws.gov/midwest/eagle/protect/laws.html)

 

 

 

 

 

 

What I find strange is that the same government passed a law the very next year that allowed for killing

of unborn, and apparently unwanted, humans.  Little ones still nestled safely in their Mother's womb.

Around 25% of them are dying before birth - on average nearly 3,300 - every day of the year.

 

 

I hear that by now, somewhere around 58 MILLION of them have perished.

Wouldn't that kind of mess up the humans plans for growth, and welfare, and

retirement?

 

 

 

 

 

Strange birds; these Homo Sapiens.  Perhaps they'll come to their senses

before they are ALL dead!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[don-o]

When the Daily Caller's Jamie Weinstein asked Trump....

When I read that I immediately went looking for source. So far...not finding it.

If accurate this is absolutely a death blow for pro-lifers support of DT.

Source must be found.

[patq]

“Leopards don’t change their spots.”

Ronald Reagan, Liberal Democrat, 1911 - 1962

[Elsie]

[MarDav]

Don’t know if this link has been posted before or not. If you’re like me and you are praying that God will be merciful and spare our nation, supporting a pro-choice candidate is antithetical to your prayer.

If there is a God, what must He think as He looks upon a world that does this:

http://www.numberofabortions.com/

[Campion]

Abortion and Presidents has been a non-issue since RvW and will forever remain so.......

So, if a President appoints a few more Ruth Bader Ginsburg clones to the SCOTUS, and they find that you have an obligation to pay for abortion with your tax dollars, that's a "non-issue" to you?

[Campion]

Trump is running to be the guy who appoints new justices to the Supreme Court. And since Congress, especially under Republicans, appears determined to rubber stamp judicial appointments, there’s no practical check-and-balance to that power.

[texhenry]

With Trump clearing them out, we get to fight another day.

---

He said he would build a wall,he did not say he would clear them out.

[lodi90]

Cruz has been a U. S. Senator 4 years and he’s spent barely 5 minutes there trying to save the dead babies. The only time they are important to him is when it’s time to pander for votes with his fairy tale social conservative agenda that has no hope of getting through a rotten Congress.

[Iscool]

Trump just days ago had a tv interview with George Steppalloverus or whatever his name is...Those questions were asked...He said he would appoint judges in the vein of Thomas...Every answer he gave showed he is as conservative as anyone running, even Cruz...Go Trump, go...

[texhenry]

Donald Trump will make certain that President Trump is one of America’s best EVER!

---

You are expecting a lot from a man that changes his mind on a weekly basis.

[MarDav]

So, with Trump are we looking at another Executive Orders president? If so, we are not voting for a president, but naming a king.

[PapaBear3625]

Currently, the most important issue is immigration. Nothing else matters at this point.

If the demographics of the US change much further, no conservative (as we define the term) will ever again gain national office. The House and Senate will be controlled by Democrats. They will make their agenda a permanent part of federal law. All hospitals will be required to offer late-term abortion as a condition of retaining accreditation.

Currently, all I care about in a candidate, is where he stands on immigration.

[Hot Tabasco]

they find that you have an obligation to pay for abortion with your tax dollars, that's a "non-issue" to you?

So you don't care about the legality of abortion, your only concern is about who pays for it........

We already are via Planned Parenthood but that can be rectified simply by defunding it.......

[bert]

abortion is a non issue in this race

to raise it is foolishness

[Cincinatus' Wife]

Currently, all I care about in a candidate, is where he stands on immigration.

And where does your candidate stand on that?