Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Las Vegas Ron; mrsmith; chris37

Sorry for jumping in (awkwardly) and I did go back and retrace the thread. I’m in agreement with you (#94) about the Constitution being the final word on eligibility. But to chris37’s earlier post, there isn’t a law that keeps an ineligible individual from _running_ for the office; I guess the Founders didn’t foresee this.


111 posted on 01/16/2016 4:15:25 PM PST by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]


To: thecodont
But to chris37’s earlier post, there isn’t a law that keeps an ineligible individual from _running_ for the office; I guess the Founders didn’t foresee this.

To me, speaking for my self only, it seems to me if you can't meet the requirement you cannot run.

For example, a VP pick who doesn't meet the requirement cannot be on the ticket, kind of like taking a driver test when you are only 10 years old.....you can take the test but you can't get the license therefor you are not allowed to take the test to begin with.

115 posted on 01/16/2016 4:22:08 PM PST by Las Vegas Ron ("Medicine is the keystone in the arch of Socialism" Vladimir Lenin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies ]

To: thecodont

there isn’t a *federal* law that keeps an ineligible individual from _running_ for the office;

There are state laws.


121 posted on 01/16/2016 4:25:50 PM PST by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson