I'm not certain of that, but it did seem that way with Obama. However it also seemed nobody had standing after Obama was in. So I say we go back to court in every way possible and challenge this until there is a federal and probably SCOTUS court ruling one way or another.
I don't think the courts can say nobody has standing until after the election given some of the after election Obama rulings. I think a case can be made that with Obama nobody has standing ever, and therefore the courts should allow challenges prior to the ballot finalization and/or prior to the elections.
Im no legal expert, but the vast majority of people who are say this is most definately the case.
In the time between the certification of election by the several states and the certification of election by the Electoral College, only the Electoral College has standing to challenge the WINNER’S eligibility.
In the time between the certification of election by the Electoral College and certification of election by the House of Representatives (leading to an inauguration), only the House of Representatives have standing to challenge the WIINER’S eligibility.
Losing contenders, parties and citizens have NO STANDING.
Dog...hunt...rinse...repeat.