‘That [Senate] Resolution [denieed Cruz] is meaningless.’
Wishful thinking. I’m sorry, I really hate to see this unfair attack against a party leader.
People are getting really angry in support of Cruz over this ... so ... just to let you know ...
What I like about Cruz ...
Cruz: ‘We Need Quite A Few Constitutional Amendments’
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3381654/posts
“Ted Cruz: Trump Will Let Deported Immigrants Back In, I Won’t”
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3379878/posts
Cruz Against Big Ethanol
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3381754/posts
Top of the food chain in the legal community and legislative experience.
Okay, eveyrone? I don’t hate Cruz. Now ...
Low information voters will be confused as heck about Cruz’ eligibility unless he can really decimate Professor Laurence Tribe and his ilk.
Cruz is the best debator we have, a brilliant constitutional scholar. If he can’t do it, no one can.
How thoughtful of you to insert words into my statement.
I said, “That Resolution is meaningless”, clearly referring to a resolution which exists, i.e. the resolution regarding McCain. That resolution is meaningless, as would any such resolution be.