To: The Ghost of FReepers Past
For me, I do not think it is the job of the federal government to pick any disease to cure. I think communicable diseases and security threats related to those sorts of issues are an issue for the federal government. Cancer is not the same. Where it may be related to exposure from this or that, especially related to the military then okay. But the private sector and the donations of citizens are the places to turn for cures for your pictured children. I agree, but I don't think that was the point Huckabee seemed to me making. It seemed pretty clear that he was advocating that there were more important things in this world than curing cancer, not that it was a job better handled by the private sector.
53 posted on
01/12/2016 7:12:14 PM PST by
presidio9
(Islam is as Islam does.)
To: presidio9
No no, not Huckabee. Just ht eopposite. He says it is high time we find a cure and as President, he would make it happen.
54 posted on
01/12/2016 7:13:27 PM PST by
The Ghost of FReepers Past
(Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
To: presidio9
He said the cure for cancer and some other things would cut down on healthcare cost.
This was all during one of the debates.
57 posted on
01/12/2016 7:15:36 PM PST by
The Ghost of FReepers Past
(Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson