But...Heidi's resume/c.v. is diametrically the opposite of Cruz's stated positions.
There is a revolving door that much has been written about between government and Goldman Sachs and other banksters. The Cruzs are part of this revolving door. And would someone ask, what was Heidi's role and where was she in 2008 and the bank bailout? She was an adviser---what did she advise? (Note that Goldman Sachs was the recipient of billions of dollars---how many billions is variously stated in the literature of the events.)
You could not write a better GLOBALIST resume than Heidi's.
This difference is far more stark than that of, for example, Mary Matalin and James Carville.
I note also that the Wikipedia version of Heidi's bio is quite different by its omissions, with no mention of several of the career highlights here.
The new paradigm we must understand is that we are now in an existential fight, and the opponents are Globalists versus Nationalists.
Cruz's stated nationalist positions simply are now reconcilable with Heidi's globalist/bankster life.
It may explain a lot of things---the Cruz TPP vote, for one. His proposal for 500,000 more H1-B visas. Opposition to deportation. Reticence to build a wall. And so forth.
Be honest friends. When the existential threat to the USA is defeated, we can then sort out our conservative vs. socialist differences. Meanwhile, if we don't have a nation---i.e., if the Globalists defeat us NATIONALISTS, it's all moot.
Is Heidi's allegiance to America and to her husband, or to her employer and to the WTO and the "free traders" (dog whistle code for free access to US markets by all other countries, but tariffs for US goods going to other markets---tariffs so high as to make trade prohibitive. Please study TRADE DEFICITS.)
Finally, the WTO and CFR do NOT have the interest of the USA at heart. The BANKS are the LEADERS in open borders and flooding America with cheap labor.
To all Freepers: please set emotion aside and consider this: Globalists versus Nationalists. THAT is the new paradigm with government. If there is no nation, there will be no conservative or liberal. Only globalism enforced by the powers that be, the UN, bank cartels, etc.
What is the “existential threat, to the United States of America?”,gg188?
Wow!
I don’t like this at all... But I’m going to do some of my own research on this before I say anything else...
Gotta wonder if the Cruznadians here understand the theory of Globalists vs. Nationalists.
The first time I read about it was in Matt Bracken/Travis McGee’s article about Tet Offensive 2. In it, Matt describes all the globalist moves, especially immigration.
It’s the only thing that comes close to explaining what may be going on here and abroad.
Cruz is pretty much on the globalist train. Domestic policy, he’s never been serious about protecting US jobs or stopping massive immigration, in my opinion. Trump is a wild card in many ways. Politics is like gamboling.
This totally turned me off Cruz months ago.
Thanks for posting it.
Or, in short, she's a stock broker.
I do not vote ‘the president’ by the skirt he has as a wife.
However, now that this information about Cruz’s skirt has become public knowledge ...
I have had a penchant for Russian women, ever since those first generation Ukrainian-American girls in my high school classes. (This was when the USSR still existed.)
I quickly got fed up with that when the MSM attempted to make an issue of Laura Bush's tragic auto accident when she was a teenager.
complex derivatives products=sh t.
That's what these clowns call them.
We (American middle class) have been at war with the globalists since 1986 and the globalists are winning. Some might even say since the federal reserve was established. I’d have a hard time arguing against that. However since 86 it been quite obvious that the globalists are out to destroy the American middle class.
When you add the following into the mix you start to get a very clear picture of Ted and Heidi Cruz.
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/12/18/us/politics/immigration-document.html?_r=2