Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RummyChick
Thanks, not much to hang your hat on without a positive explanation of what Madison thought it did mean.

Madison was a federalist. I suspect had I been around then I'd have been an ardent anti-federalist so this I'm ok if I occasionally end up on the other side of an issue.

47 posted on 01/11/2016 4:31:06 PM PST by Idaho_Cowboy (Ride for the Brand. Joshua 24:15)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: Idaho_Cowboy

Unfortunately, there is nothing that can be found (that I know of) in the records that pertains to why Madison took that action.

All we know is that he took that action and removed the definition.


55 posted on 01/11/2016 4:36:16 PM PST by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

To: Idaho_Cowboy

By the way, one of the theories of Gordon was that Madison may have wanted to give the States more rights when it came to citizens - so he took out the definition.

Seems to me that the natural born citizen definition should be the same for every State ..so I don’t quite understand that theory. I must be missing something in his analysis.


67 posted on 01/11/2016 4:42:32 PM PST by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson