The 1790 Naturalization Act was repealed (as in revoked and annulled) by the 1795 Naturalization Act.
You’d think all you Constitutional scholars out there would know this and stop foolishly citing a repealed law. Might as well cite laws governing the size of buggy wheels for all the relevancy.
you think that a person would actually read the context of another person’s comments so to know that every time I addressed the 1790 Act it was in response to how citizenship is acquired, that and the fact that ALL the Acts of Congress are naturalization Acts as Congress has no need, or authority, to confer US citizen on a child born in the US when the child’s parents (BOTH) are US citizens. But in the case where the parents are married and the father is NOT a US citizen, THEN Congress has the authority to say yes or no, this child is a citizen ... hence the one of the reasons the Naturalization Act of 1790 was passed, repealed and replaced in 1795, and that Act was replaced in 1802,so WHY are you still quoting a law that has been replaced?