Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bobby_Taxpayer
"she had a secure fax machine outside of a secure facility? another criminal matter!"

Exactly. She was expected receipt of this material... via secure fax. Other thoughts:

1. For anyone doubting, there's no reason to involve a secure transmission system unless the material in expressly classified. It's too much of a hassle to do otherwise. Such machines are supposed to be kept inside secured vaults... not just behind a simple locked office door, for instance.

1a. If there was any such transmission device kept anywhere other than a secured vault, then yes - another felony. And it does sound like that might have been the case, given the exchange in the emails.

2. The reason we aren't seeing the followup email to her is probably the obvious one: it likely contains the talking points she was after... which, of course, would have been classified and therefore was not released with the emails we're looking at here.

3. "Talking Points" are obviously just that - things for her to use when talking to the media... or, as we've seen, things to pass around to the media so that this arm of the Democrat party can be in lock-step with the administration they so much support. The question I would be asking is this: was she releasing classified information to the media via talking point memos???

4. Finally, does any of that sequence of emails shown seem 'routine' to any of you?... for it sure does to me.

97 posted on 01/09/2016 7:06:00 AM PST by alancarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]


To: alancarp
*expecting
98 posted on 01/09/2016 7:06:34 AM PST by alancarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]

To: alancarp

If she had a secure room somewhere outside Foggy Bottom, then she could have had a secure and classified computer terminal (2 different thing). In either case she deliberately avoided both.

Having worked inside the Intel community rules, they’ve got to be cringing that a senior government official deliberately skated the rules (and the law) and will set a precedence for future prosecutions. If she isn’t prosecuted the the full extent of the law, then the AG and by virtue of his position as POTUS, both should be impeached


102 posted on 01/09/2016 9:41:41 AM PST by Bobby_Taxpayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson