Moron Joseph DiGenova says this is a “smoking gun.” Huh?
There’s no disclosure of classified information in this exchange and nothing incriminating happened.
Its a stretch to say she broke the law. To do that, the government has to show classified information was sent over insecure channels.
Nothing in evidence to substantiate that here even if you hate as I do, Hillary’s sleazy ethics.
And being an unethical person isn’t the same as being a criminal.
Whether she’s fit to serve as President is ultimately for the American people to decide.
If they have these emails then they should also have, if it was sent, the email to which they refer complete with its contents- the one that she instructed them to send...which they can look at to determine if its contents were classified.
It’s proof she directed a subordinate to feloniously violate a clearly understood law. I’m not convinced it requires _actually_ sending the classified document as directed, akin to soliciting a murder without someone actually getting killed is still a felony.
As the classifier of data, isn’t she criminally liable for knowingly ordering nonclassified transmission fo classified data, including removing classification markings?
Thanks for your post. I thought I was going crazy or read a different email than everybody else did. There is NOTHING here. Nowhere at all is sending classified info or removing classified headers discussed. She is just talking about sending talking points via a non secure method that can be intercepted.