Thanks for your post. I thought I was going crazy or read a different email than everybody else did. There is NOTHING here. Nowhere at all is sending classified info or removing classified headers discussed. She is just talking about sending talking points via a non secure method that can be intercepted.
“Nowhere at all is sending classified info or removing classified headers discussed.”
What part of “turn into nonpaper with no identifying header and send nonsecure” sounds legal to you?
Again, giving the order is enough to destroy her campaign. But if they have this direction to Sullivan, they can find that email, and she’s indicted.