To: Las Vegas Ron
But you don't punish the ones who fulfilled their sentences, you should punish the judge who erred in the sentencing, no?I agree that the judge needs to be held to account but don't see why the convicted lawbreakers shouldn't serve the full sentence mandated by law.
21 posted on
01/04/2016 4:21:25 PM PST by
semimojo
To: semimojo
I agree that the judge needs to be held to account but don't see why the convicted lawbreakers shouldn't serve the full sentence mandated by law. Not withstanding the fact it's a draconian law, improperly imposed, it's been over 2 years since their sentence was fulfilled.
This is an immoral miscarriage of justice, imho.
25 posted on
01/04/2016 4:26:23 PM PST by
Las Vegas Ron
("Medicine is the keystone in the arch of Socialism" Vladimir Lenin)
To: semimojo
...but don't see why the convicted lawbreakers shouldn't serve the full sentence mandated by law. Seriously? Good Lord some authoritarian "conservatives" are as obtuse as the most blockheaded progressives.
38 posted on
01/04/2016 4:36:16 PM PST by
MileHi
(Liberalism is an ideology of parasites, hypocrites, grievance mongers, victims, and control freaks.)
To: semimojo
Should they have been convicted under terrorism laws in the first place?
To: semimojo; Las Vegas Ron
I agree that the judge needs to be held to account but don't see why the convicted lawbreakers shouldn't serve the full sentence mandated by law. How many years did Bill Clinton serve again, for perjuring himself in the face of federal judge Susan Webber Wright?
102 posted on
01/04/2016 5:23:11 PM PST by
kiryandil
("When Muslims in the White House are outlawed, only Barack Obama will be an outlaw")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson