“Wharton School of Economics and built a 10 Billion dollar worldwide empire?”
I am a Milton Freedman type of Economics person. The Trumpster did indeed do well at Wharton as well as build his real estate empire. As the Trumpster has already stated, He contributed to various politicians so that when he called and needed something the politicians would pick up the phone and talk to him.
I do not think that the Supreme courts KELO decision that the Trumpster supports is constitutional. But than I do not have or purchase as much real estate as the Trumpster.
Now to a comment you made a little while back
Sunday Morning Talk Show Thread 18 October 2015
10/18/2015, 12:08:23 PM · 129 of 187
DanZ to bray
“As much as I love Cruz, I still can’t get over the fact that his wife was a bigwig at Goldman Sachs. What is she doing there of all places?â€
There nothing wrong with someone in the family making Big money. Also it is good to make it while you are young so you can enjoy what this world has to offer
Do not forget the Donald gave money to many Democrats (a.k.a.) Communists
Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies
If you have issues with Ted Cruz’s wife making money - Why do you not have issues with the Trumpster making money?
And finally - A little bit about Limited G’ment and ECONOMICS
A memo written by Cruz and his deputy, Jerry Ellig, shortly before his departure to Texas
included a chart of the office’s projects, his calculation of how successful each project had been,
an estimate of the probability that decision-makers listened to the FTC,
and an estimate of the probability of the same outcome without any advocacy or action from the FTC.
(Cruz and Ellig concluded the FTC had influenced the outcome in eleven of the 14 projects that were not pending.)
Initially, Cruz proposed an ambitious agenda that featured efforts
to roll back regulations on teacher certification, hospital accreditation,
and local governments’ agreements with cable television.
Cruz and the other FTC staff successfully defeated changes aimed at
allowing competing physicians in Alaska and Washington
to engage in collective bargaining with health plans
over fees and other contract terms, arguing that the proposals
would increase health-care costs and reduce access to care,
without ensuring better outcomes for patients.
Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/416074/ted-cruz-bush-years-jim-geraghty
Of course debating economics at the SC is far more valuable than real world experience. No wonder you look down at us Trump supporters.
What you don’t get is arguing the Constitution is a big yawn to most voters. It may get your juices flowing, but most people’s eyes glaze over on that and budget debates.
Sorry damn Cruise’s wife is one of the architects of the trade bill that’s screwing the country left and right.
better dig into things a little bit more bud.