Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: grania

Yes, innuendo. If Hillary had a serial killer campaigning for her, it would be wrong to imply she was also a serial killer, right? Maybe terrible judgement, but that’s a direct problem. Innuendo as Ted seems to be using it here is simple- minded guilt by association. It’s a bad form of argument because it doesn’t deal with the real problem, the flaws in the policy and character of the candidate. This sort of thing just drives it home again that Ted is living out his Christian faith, and that should play well with the vast new evangelical coalition he is hoping to build. It makes sense.

Peace,

SR


35 posted on 12/30/2015 7:05:54 AM PST by Springfield Reformer (Winston Churchill: No Peace Till Victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Springfield Reformer
This sort of thing just drives it home again that Ted is living out his Christian faith, and that should play well with the vast new evangelical coalition he is hoping to build. It makes sense.

Once again, you hit the nail squarely on its head. Every day, I am more convinced that Cruz's substance will overcome Trump's sizzle in the long haul.

Flash back one year and recall what even the mention of Donald Trump elicited here...

NYC sharp operator
Mobbed up
Multiple marriages
Out of touch with normal Americans
Bankruptcies
Bad hair
Clown

For starters. And I would bet that some of his newly minted, true believer fans were rock solid in their dismissal of him as a potential President.

It is a truly wondrous thing to see so much baggage go so missing, so rapidly.

113 posted on 12/30/2015 7:42:48 AM PST by don-o (I am Kenneth Carlisle - Waco 5/17/15)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: Springfield Reformer
ie: hillary and "guilt by association"

Oh, it's much more than that. She enabled Bill's very bad behavior with other women....even helped him avoid responsibility. Just what branch of Christianity permits a wife to enable her husband's adultery?

Cruz saying it's not an issue is like Sanders saying no one cares about hillary's emails. hillary has time and again demonstrated that it is not a moral or ethical compass that guides her.

In a campaign, it's a winning issue, that it's about time we go someone decent in the WH. Why would Cruz avoid that discussion?

191 posted on 12/30/2015 9:26:16 AM PST by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: Springfield Reformer
This sort of thing just drives it home again that Ted is living out his Christian faith

These idiots don't know that Christ was calling the Pharisees the children of Satan, and Paul was calling heretics "dogs," believers in devils, and urging them to emasculate themselves!

I do not understand this sissyified nonsense put out by Cruz and his supporters.

244 posted on 12/30/2015 1:11:51 PM PST by Greetings_Puny_Humans (I mostly come out at night... mostly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson