Skip to comments.
Police Won’t Investigate ACLU Board Member’s Call To ‘Shoot’ Trump Supporters
Daily Caller ^
| 12-11-15
| Alex Pappas
Posted on 12/11/2015 10:04:02 AM PST by markomalley
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
I'm shocked /sarc
To: markomalley
I’m sure Loretta Lynch is going to look into this. /s
2
posted on
12/11/2015 10:05:52 AM PST
by
TruthWillWin
(The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other peoples money.)
To: markomalley
Hop on here and announce that we should shoot Hillary or Obama, and the SWAT team will be knocking down your door in ten minutes.
To: markomalley
That did not take long
nothing to see here, move along folks
4
posted on
12/11/2015 10:07:37 AM PST
by
arl295
To: markomalley
Once again we see the hypocrisy and double standard in play for liberals.
5
posted on
12/11/2015 10:08:31 AM PST
by
Responsibility2nd
(With Great Freedom comes Great Responsibility)
To: markomalley
Loretta Lynch said she would prosecute anybody making threats against muslims. But it’s open season against police and republicans, especially a republican presidential candidate.
To: Buckeye McFrog
“Hop on here and announce that we should shoot Hillary or Obama, and the SWAT team will be knocking down your door in ten minutes.”
Here’s an idea, do it from one of the computers down at the publc library! Or the “Diversity Office” from your local “instituition of higher learning.”
7
posted on
12/11/2015 10:09:39 AM PST
by
vette6387
To: markomalley
"There is not an investigation underway as the contents of the threat do not address a specific individual who could be considered a victim,"
I remember the police investigated a anonymous post on Twitter about someone who wanted to shoot all black people on a New Jersey college campus. Turns out a black alumni sent out that tweet. The double standard is disgusting
8
posted on
12/11/2015 10:10:03 AM PST
by
arl295
To: markomalley
So much for equally applying their principles.
9
posted on
12/11/2015 10:10:14 AM PST
by
The Ghost of FReepers Past
(Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
To: markomalley
10
posted on
12/11/2015 10:11:28 AM PST
by
rktman
(Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
To: Buckeye McFrog
They may be on your doorstep now.
11
posted on
12/11/2015 10:11:53 AM PST
by
duffee
(No money to the Mississippi Republican Party t Trumpas long as joe nosef is chairman)
To: markomalley
the secret service by law must investigate if someone reports a threat to someone they are protecting.
12
posted on
12/11/2015 10:12:14 AM PST
by
TexasFreeper2009
(You can't spell Hillary without using the letters L, I, A, & R)
To: markomalley
Of course not..hey its OK to kill Conservatives..but if a Conservative wears a Confederate Flag T-shirt he is called a terrorist and is arrested
To: markomalley
You knew that they would not. And you can also bet the farm that when the time comes that the red necks have to protect their families from the muslims that the enforcement arm of the Government, the police, will come down on the red necks with both feet.
14
posted on
12/11/2015 10:13:14 AM PST
by
sport
To: markomalley
"The thing is, we have to really reach out to those who might consider voting for Trump and say, 'This is Goebbels. This is the final solution. If you are voting for him I will have to shoot you before election day.' They're not going to listen to reason, so when justice is gone, there's always force, as Laurie would say." I'm calling micro aggression on the use of the term "final solution", and macro aggression on the written threat of deadly assault.
15
posted on
12/11/2015 10:14:04 AM PST
by
Flick Lives
(One should not attend even the end of the world without a good breakfast. -- Heinlein)
To: Buckeye McFrog
Shit, your post won’t even have time to post before your doors come flying in.
16
posted on
12/11/2015 10:14:53 AM PST
by
sport
To: markomalley
I see. So any non-specific threat against a class of people (such as a minority group) is now perfectly legal, eh?
17
posted on
12/11/2015 10:15:11 AM PST
by
MortMan
(I am offended by those who believe they have a right not to be offended.)
To: markomalley
Civil liberties for me, but not for thee.
18
posted on
12/11/2015 10:15:39 AM PST
by
Moonman62
(The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
To: markomalley
See it’s only hate speech if the Right does it, when the Left does it it’s freedom of speech.
19
posted on
12/11/2015 10:15:41 AM PST
by
SkyDancer
("Nobody Said I Was Perfect But Yet Here I Am")
To: TexasFreeper2009
The threats aren’t against Trump, however.
20
posted on
12/11/2015 10:16:05 AM PST
by
ErnBatavia
(It ain't a "hashtag"....it's a damn pound sign. ###)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson