The lady in NJ was offered ten times the 180k it appraised for then, She was greedy is what many said. She sold the place in 2014 at auction. She asked 995 K and netted 500 K. The lady got what greed usually pays.
Not relevant to the issue !
If she didn't want to sell, and leave her home of many years, just so the city could have ANOTHER TRUMP HOTEL, then CONSTITUTIONALLY she was in the RIGHT.
"EMINENT DOMAIN" to profit a PRIVATE CORPORTATION IS NOT CONSTITUTIONAL !
Trump has publicly defended the confiscation of private property for eminent domain, even when
the use for which the property is confiscated is purely private in nature: