Posted on 12/05/2015 8:54:06 AM PST by Kevin in California
Yes it is, and he was wearing it before marriage. The question is, WHY?
Could he be some kind of secret Muslim devote, groomed from the very beginning to become a future leader of the greatest nation on earth for the furtherance of liberal causes, but more importantly and clandestinely, the cause of ISLAM?
So WHY would Obama do this??? Not trying to be cute, asking a serious question here?
That is not the same video.
“...the cause of ISLAM?”
There is no longer any doubt. He is an enemy of American patriots.
To destabilize Mexico, resulting in more immigrants. He also wanted to blame US guns for Mexico's problems.
I believe it was for multiple reasons too. The last one you give, "He also wanted to blame US guns for Mexico's problems.", is a reason with ties back to Obama's abundant efforts to take our guns from his very first days in office.
WHY?
Obama doesn't care about the well being of others. That's obvious from the desolation his policies have created. So, what could be the real reason for taking American guns?
They are, however, interested in disarming law abiding citizens whom they see as a threat to their power.
All you have to do is scroll down at the link. That’s where I watched the video.
Yes. Percy Sutton, owner of a race ranting radio station, was Malcom X’s attorney, and subsequently, with Khlald Al Nosair(Black Panther became Wahabi Muslim), pushed for his Columbia University scholarship. Nosair was an advisor to the Saudi royal.
“So WHY would Obama do this??? Not trying to be cute, asking a serious question here?”
They clearly did it (the operation was called Fast and Furious), and was reportedly done so that weapons being used by Mexican drug dealers would be traced back to the US. That info would be used to smear the NRA and be used as an excuse for gun control.
Okay, tinfoil hat time: what's the possibility the attack by this ISIS cell in San Bernardino could have been, in large part, for the very same reason?
After all, this administration and its media outlets immediately called for more gun control, almost as if they were primed and ready to go with their stories and speeches.
We know for a fact that ISIS has said it would strike the US very soon. What if someone(s) in this administration sat on specific information about when and where this attack was to take place? Worse, what if ISIS moles in our own government played a role in activating this particular cell to strike?
Not saying or implying someone actually did. I'm just asking what if, and if so, how does it benefit this administration's goals and those of its Muslim supporters.
I think it's worth investigating further.
“Okay, tinfoil hat time: what’s the possibility the attack by this ISIS cell in San Bernardino could have been, in large part, for the very same reason?”
I’m not a big conspiracy guy so I doubt it. Then there is the fact that this attack makes the bat eared mooley in the white house look very bad. His GW conference didnt have the effect on muslims he claimed it would, and the attack wasnt done some right wing whackos like they originally hoped. IMO the current focus on gun control is to deflect attention from the fact that this was done by Muslims, the same people Ob@stard and his media minions seek to protect.
I differ with you. Gun control has been very high on their bucket list since day one. A lot of effort and risk by this administration went into Fast & Furious, which at the time was considered "conspiracy theory" until the truth came out.
San Bernadino is a manufactured event - by someone - and Obama surely isn't going to let it go to waste, as he is acting surprisingly fast to use it to control guns. He has sealed the culprit's immigration records; the apartment belonging to the killers was allowed to be ransacked by reporters; the killers passed DHS vetting.
And are you telling me the FBI wasn't watching them after they had made numerous contacts with other known terrorists, and traveled to Saudi Arabia, pledged allegiance to ISIS, and etc. They sound almost like 911 the terrorists, if you think about it.
Okay, go ahead and call me a suspicious cynic. But I still don't trust Obama, or anyone in his administration - including his Muslim Brotherhood cohorts. Usually where there's smoke, there's fire.
“I differ with you. Gun control has been very high on their bucket list since day one. A lot of effort and risk by this administration went into Fast & Furious, which at the time was considered “conspiracy theory” until the truth came out.”
I agree that gun control is a high priority of Oburka but so is Muslim advocacy. After the Paris attack he made some especially stupid comments and the SB attack made him look particularly idiotic. As I said before the focus on gun control moves the discussion away from Muslims/immigrants etc, but a valid argument can also be made that he can use it go on the offensive about guns.
Was SB a “manufacutured event” like Fast and Furious? I doubt it. Was the FBI watching the Farookians? I doubt that too. Without strong evidence I tend to attribute things to incompetence rather than conspiracy. This admin is a model of incompetence from top to bottom. I dont think terrorism is as high a priority for the Oburka team as is Muslim advocacy, “browning” the country and generally pizzing on white Americans.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.