Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cronos

All the unnecessary ones. Coalitions can be agreed to on a case by case basis. There is no need to have a pre arranged defense agreement with everyone. We don’t know what the issues are yet. NATO should be a coalition of larger countries for world stability and regional security, not world dominance and NOT so they can offer their military services to all the small countries of the world. They can case by case. Too big is too dominate and it undermines the purpose of stability.

Power corrupts. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. (Quoting somebody or other)

I am no one important so don’t let my opinions worry you.


18 posted on 12/02/2015 8:57:10 AM PST by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: The Ghost of FReepers Past

well, NATO’s aim is to contain Russia. Or it WAS


19 posted on 12/03/2015 2:02:33 AM PST by Cronos (Obama�s dislike of Assad is not based on Assad�s brutality but that he isn't a jihadi Mosl)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson