Replies

Yes, I know about the report of Muslims in New Jersey but that was a written or oral report, not a film and Trump said he “saw” them. Also, the written/oral report did not say there were “thousands” of them as Trump said.

Plus, that written/oral report of law enforcement said they were questioning “people” (didn’t say they were Muslim), said “allegedly” seen celebrating the attack so there was no eye witness to that - it was just reported, not seen.

Trump is not careful in his speech to make sure he has the actual facts and he exaggerates to make his point. As I said, that exaggeration is okay in his real estate dealings, but not for a president who we need to be able to trust he is giving us the truth and nothing but the truth without exaggeration making it false.

I agree. There exists no footage of thousands (or even hundreds or dozens) Muslims celebrating 911 in the states. It didn't happen, so Trump did not see what he says he saw on his television.

Producing a first or second or third hand report that some Muslims somewhere may have been happy does not prove Trump correct.

Of course many Muslims were happy about 911, but they generally kept it amongst themselves in the US and certainly did not gather in the thousands to openly celebrate anywhere in this country.

Trump "misremembered" it. He should just admit that and move on.

Yes, I know about the report of Muslims in New Jersey but that was a written or oral report, not a film and Trump said he "saw" them. Also, the written/oral report did not say there were "thousands" of them as Trump said.

Maybe Trump was watching CNBC like my good FRiends StephenJohnBanker, Darksheare and I were?

Plus, that written/oral report of law enforcement said they were questioning "people" (didn't say they were Muslim), said "allegedly" seen celebrating the attack so there was no eye witness to that - it was just reported, not seen.

Guess you weren't tuned into CNBC.

Trump is not careful in his speech to make sure he has the actual facts and he exaggerates to make his point. As I said, that exaggeration is okay in his real estate dealings, but not for a president who we need to be able to trust he is giving us the truth and nothing but the truth without exaggeration making it false.

So which is it, are you sticking up for the Muzzie subversives among us, or are you just using this like a stick to attack Trump with?

Enlighten us about that, would you?