Oh Emm Geee! And this will be the panties in a wad next gov of California? Stupidity remains unrestrained in the political lib land. Sorry to my conservative Cali friends that these assclowns keep being foisted on you.
I watched 2 french nationals who survived the bataclan massacre declare that we are safer with LESS guns.
I wrote it off to their being in shock
Pointing the trigger?.............This guy doesn’t even know which end the bullet comes out of!................
Bimbo. And Californians will elect the yutz.
This is what happens when one writes an editorial while stoned.
Hey Brad Wilmouth - learn from our founding fathers:
IT IS BETTER TO DIE ON YOUR FEET THAN LIVE ON YOUR KNEES
We’ve got an entire state full of people barely literate in english who know only that the GOP is the party of white racists and their dear old non-english speaking mom will continue to get her monthly check if they vote for the democrat.
Who wrote it - Gavin Nuisance or Brad Bigmouth?
I had a similar conversation with my lib sister a while ago. She felt that her life would be in greater danger if lawfully armed civilians engaged a murderous maniac in a shootout. I asked her if she was hoping that the unopposed kook killing everyone was going to run out of ammo before he got to her.
This reads like someone smoking dope wrote it
Can anyone figure out what it means?
If nothing else -- their action might buy me enough time to make an escape.
does this suckhole have a security detail???He’s been accompanied by armed cops (first SFPD and now CHP) 24/7 since he was elected Mayor of San Francisco in 2003, and had private security for years before that.
Thank you for your input Mr. Guilfoyle.
You must remember that when libs talk about banning guns they’re not including themselves. Libs love guns just as much as anyone. Their problem with guns is that you can have them too. Those sitting ducks he’s talking about are you, not him.
The so-called reasonable man argument. Isn't it funny how the left invariable falls on one side of the argument ("I can't trust myself with firearms so no one should have firearms") and the right falls on the other side ("Yes, there's a chance that an inept man with a gun makes things worse but I'm willing to take that chance").
I believe that it goes to a basic understanding (misunderstanding) of human character. The left pretends to hold the individual in the highest regard but in truth they don't trues anyone - especially themselves. The right OTOH displays a cynical public face but in truth recognizes that human character runs the gamut.
It is manifested in the age-old axiom that "If a conservative doesn't want to own a gun he doesn't own one. If a leftist doesn't want to own a gun he makes sure that no one can own one."