This has nothing to do with widows and orphans. Is this getting clearer now?
“Mr. Hollande, like U.S. President Barack Obama, has long held that Mr. Assad is a chief source of the Syrian crisis and must be removed from office before Syria’s woes can be addressed. Moscow and Tehran are longtime Assad supporters.”
Then he should resign. But of course it’s all about him.
PFL
It’s a rather polite and policy wonk way of saying that Obama is cheering for our enemies. Keep in mind he tried to sell out Egypt to the extremists and almost succeeded.
Obama is a dangerous and disgusting leftist of the first order. I think he fancies himself a part of, and expert on, the Muslim world. No accident he is trying to flood the USA with Muslims.
He’s a narcissistic child. to a dangerous extreme.
not easy to read his mind on this matter.
but whatever will hurt America most, he’s for.
Death to America.
Would what replaces Assad be even worse?
Rush explains at about the 6 min mark
9:16 Minutes
PUSSY-FOOTING! Rush Gives Real World, On The Ground Evidence Of Obama’s Allegiance With Iran, Syria
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FLQvA4jSGh8
Here is the story Rush talks about - Assad is buying oil from ISIS while we are being told ISIS is trying to wipe out Assad. (Assad is thus funding ISIS). If we really wanted to destroy ISIS, we would take out the oil fields like Trump said.
Obama Administration Weighs Partnership with Russia Against Islamic State
http://freebeacon.com/national-security/obama-administration-weighs-partnership-with-russia-against-islamic-state/
Mark Toner, State Department spokesman, said on Monday at a press briefing that U.S. officials have also urged their Russian counterparts to talk with Assad’s government about no longer purchasing oil from the Islamic State. Though Assad claims to be fighting terrorists in his country’s civil war, his regime is reported to have been a participant in the Islamic State’s oil trade, a lucrative venture that enables the terrorist group to earn millions every year from seized oil fields.
More
Obama Has A Different Strategy; Bowing To Iran
http://noisyroom.net/blog/2015/11/17/obama-has-a-different-strategy-bowing-to-iran/
Bkmrk.
I am beginning to think this whole crisis was carefully brokered with Iran via Jarret PRIOR to Obama’s election.
That’s why there was absolutely no American intervention in Iran`s abortive Green Revolution, years ago.
THEY HAD A DEAL.
There’s only one problem with the thesis.
Yemen.
Yemeni President Hadi has already returned to Aden, soon Sanaa will fall. This simply could not have been accomplished without American in-flight refueling of Saudi and UAE bomb-laden jets.
I never could get my head around this, as it was during the tense final days of the Iran-nuke agreement negotiations that the decision was made to supply refueling services to enable the attacks in Yemen, completely contrary to Iranian interests there. And Iran wanted Yemen, almost had control through their Houthi proxies, and as such, Hadi’s return to Aden is a tremendous defeat for the Mullahs.
A big black eye. Enabled, no-not possible at all-without Obama’s decision to provide the critical mid-air refueling that all the Sunni-Arab coalition sorties required.
How does this square with the thesis that Obama wants the Iranians to dominate the region? During this time, Obama also approved delivery of American weaponry to Egypt, to el-Sisi, whom he obviously abhors. What’s up with this?
To me, he’s been playing both sides, hopefully, someone here can help me understand why I’m wrong.
IMPOSSIBLE SITUATION
U.S.A. needs to abolish the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 and return to the National Origins Formula which restricted immigration on the basis of existing proportions of the U.S. population.
bkmk