Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Official Notice of Dispute challenges 4 candidates' NH eligibility (Cruz, Jindal, Rubio, Santorum)
The Post & Email ^ | 11/13/2015 | Robert Laity

Posted on 11/14/2015 2:48:45 PM PST by ScottWalkerForPresident2016

I wish to NOTIFY you that the bona-fides of four Republican Candidates to be President is hereby DISPUTED. It is claimed that the following persons do NOT meet the United States Constitutional requirement that one be a "Natural-Born Citizen" in order to be President under Article II, Sec. 1.

I am disputing the bona-fides of:

Marco Rubio - NOT an NBC. He was born in the U.S., however his parents were un-naturalized "permanent resident" Cuban citizens when he was born.

Ted Cruz - NOT an NBC. He was born in Canada to a Cuban father and American mother who may have natualized as a Canadian.

Bobby Jindal - NOT an NBC. He was born in the U.S. to parents who were un-naturalized citizens of Indiaa at the time of Bobby Jindal's bitth.

Rick Santorum - NOT an NBC. He was born in the U.S. to a father who was an Italian citizen not naturalized at the time of Rick Santorum's birth.

(Excerpt) Read more at thepostemail.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: New Hampshire
KEYWORDS: 2016; birthers; bs; cruz; jindal; naturalborncitizen; newhampshire; nh; rubio; santorum
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 521-533 next last
To: DiogenesLamp
Everything you wrote after that first bit is drivel. You don't have a grasp of the concept of "naturalization by class."

Where is that defined?

I doubt this is worth it, but I will point out that the children of people who are naturalized don't go through a naturalization process either.

Depends on how old they are. Unless they were born here they would derive citizenship when their parents are naturalized so long as they were under 18 and living with their parents. As the naturalization laws state. If they were born here then they're citizens at birth, unless they fall under the normal exceptions.

181 posted on 11/16/2015 6:26:28 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp
WRONG AGAIN !
People that are made U.S. Citizens by the naturalization process, have a document stating they are naturalized.
Children born overseas of military members and U.S. Diplomats, DO NOT !
They ARE considered NATURAL BORN CITIZENS, and as such, have a normal birth certificate.
I know, because I'm retired military, AND I've had an ex-wife that WAS Naturalized.
I was with her every step of the way THROUGH that naturalization process.
So ... get A CLUE ... and ... get an EDUCATION !
182 posted on 11/16/2015 6:48:44 AM PST by Yosemitest (It's SIMPLE ! ... Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg
Children of immigrants who were born in foreign countries while their parents were still citizens of that country become US Citizens by derivative naturalization. They don't have to go through a naturalization process.

The fact that they don't go through a naturalization process does not make them "natural born citizens."

If they are born in this country to alien parents, they get 14th amendment (statutory) citizenship which is still not natural citizenship.

183 posted on 11/16/2015 6:53:40 AM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest
A person born out of the jurisdiction of the United States can only become a citizen by being naturalized

-United States Supreme Court, United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 1898-

184 posted on 11/16/2015 6:56:30 AM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

Like I said, post it all you want, but it IS a LIE !


185 posted on 11/16/2015 7:02:28 AM PST by Yosemitest (It's SIMPLE ! ... Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

But then again, you probably don’t know what an EXCEPTION is !


186 posted on 11/16/2015 7:03:24 AM PST by Yosemitest (It's SIMPLE ! ... Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp
The fact that they don't go through a naturalization process does not make them "natural born citizens."

But in point of fact they do go through the naturalization process. That's how the get their citizenship to begin with. Parents are naturalized. Children under 18 become citizens as a result of the same naturalization process. Nobody is suggesting that they are considered natural-born citizens. Except maybe you.

If they are born in this country to alien parents, they get 14th amendment (statutory) citizenship which is still not natural citizenship.

Yeah, it is. It isn't naturalized citizenship so it has be natural-born citizenship. It has to be one or the other.

187 posted on 11/16/2015 7:03:39 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest
But then again, you probably don't know what an EXCEPTION is !

I'm sorry. I don't see anything that resembles an exception in the court's opinion on the subject.

A person born out of the jurisdiction of the United States can only become a citizen by being naturalized, ...

There's precious little wiggle room in that statement. Where do you suppose you could fit in an exception?

188 posted on 11/16/2015 7:07:35 AM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest
Like I said, post it all you want, but it IS a LIE !

Well it may be wrong, but it is hardly a lie. The Majority of the court based their decision on the assumption that the United States law on citizenship was based on English common law. In that context, their statement is exactly correct. Even the English had to create a statute specifically granting Subject status to the children of Englishmen born in foreign countries.

Regarding the Supreme Court, I would argue that their base assumption is incorrect, but a difference of opinion and a difference in legal foundation hardly constituents a lie.

189 posted on 11/16/2015 7:11:53 AM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg
But in point of fact they do go through the naturalization process. That's how the get their citizenship to begin with. Parents are naturalized.

The parents go through a naturalization process. The Children do not.

190 posted on 11/16/2015 7:13:02 AM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: ScottWalkerForPresident2016

It’s good to get this settled now.

I think it will be settled in favor of these four American candidates.


191 posted on 11/16/2015 7:14:50 AM PST by NeoCaveman (DC, it's Versailles on the Potomac but without the food and culture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp
The parents go through a naturalization process. The Children do not.

But they derive their citizenship as a result of the naturalization process their parents went through. They are naturalized citizens.

192 posted on 11/16/2015 7:18:12 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg
But they derive their citizenship as a result of the naturalization process their parents went through. They are naturalized citizens.

As are any citizens who are naturalized at birth as a class.

193 posted on 11/16/2015 7:19:27 AM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp
Through experience, which is something you have little of.

People that are made U.S. Citizens by the naturalization process, have a document stating they are naturalized.
Children born overseas of military members and U.S. Diplomats, DO NOT !
They ARE considered NATURAL BORN CITIZENS, and as such, have a normal birth certificate.
I know, because I'm retired military, AND I've had an ex-wife that WAS Naturalized.
I was with her every step of the way THROUGH that naturalization process.
So ... get A CLUE ... and ... get an EDUCATION !
194 posted on 11/16/2015 7:19:32 AM PST by Yosemitest (It's SIMPLE ! ... Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: NeoCaveman
It’s good to get this settled now.

I think it will be settled in favor of these four American candidates.

With the courts deciding that marriage encompasses faggotry, you may well be correct.

195 posted on 11/16/2015 7:20:42 AM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest
Through experience, which is something you have little of.

The word "experience" does not appear anywhere in the text. Here, i'll quote it again so you can see that the word "experience" is not in there.

A person born out of the jurisdiction of the United States can only become a citizen by being naturalized, ...

See? No "experience" in there. No exceptions either that I can see.

196 posted on 11/16/2015 7:22:49 AM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp
As are any citizens who are naturalized at birth as a class.

Nobody is naturalized at birth. Naturalization requires a legal process. If you achieve citizenship at birth then you are natural-born.

197 posted on 11/16/2015 7:23:06 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp


198 posted on 11/16/2015 7:23:16 AM PST by Yosemitest (It's SIMPLE ! ... Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest
Link to source
199 posted on 11/16/2015 7:24:45 AM PST by Yosemitest (It's SIMPLE ! ... Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg
Nobody is naturalized at birth.

If the statute that naturalizes them says "at birth", then they are naturalized at birth.

Read the court's opinion in Rogers v Bellei.

200 posted on 11/16/2015 7:25:03 AM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 521-533 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson