Your imaginary cage schtick — like all was missing from the picture was sufficient self-will — is mocking to Yahweh. And your misdirections further prove you are on the team of the sulfurous one.
Yea well opinions vary on that. Yours dosent really matter.
I wouldn’t say “all” that was missing was sufficient self-will, but I don’t see how one could argue that wasn’t a contributing factor in the Paris attacks. Look at how Parisians dealt with their Muslim “problem”. They basically put them in no go zones and said “that’s that problem solved”.
They never put any real curtail on their actions in country, nor really monitored the goings on in such zones (obviously) and they (didn’t do) any of this largely because of “political correctness”. It’s un-PC to do or say anything negative about Islam so they only contained the issue in the unspoken no go zones. It was only a matter of time before such an ineffectual strategy backfired.
It’s only a matter of time before something similar happens here for the same, large reason. We need to overcome this reactive approach dictated by “political correctness”. We need to be more pro-active in neutralizing threats. (Like extremist Islamics or leftists). In other words we need more “self-will”: more dedication to what’s right and the fortitude to see it through to the end.
I think Norm’s “cage” approach is too extreme but I’d wager he’s not suggesting taking it completely literally. He told me when I asked about it that he was/is “half-joking” with it. So I don’t see anything wrong with the concept, as an educational tool at least.