Posted on 11/10/2015 4:50:18 AM PST by Utilizer
Hillary Clinton has repeatedly denied any wrong doing when she used a private email account on a private email server while serving as secretary of state. She insisted that she hadn’t violated any sort of policies regarding classified information. Well, it appears that a ‘smoking gun’ has emerged- and it’s BIG!
Clinton did, in fact sign a non-disclosure agreement acknowledging her responsibility to ascertain whether information shared by her was, in fact, classified. Moreover, the document Clinton signed clearly lays out stiff criminal penalties for “any unauthorized disclosure†of classified information.
(Excerpt) Read more at freebeacon.com ...
Documents don’t prosecute. Prosecutors prosecute.
Yawn...
Nothing will happen
I’m sure this will be a top story in Politico today. /sarc
Correct. If it hasn’t happened by now, it’s not going to happen.
TOO BIG TO JAIL!!
I never click on articles that have “EXPLOSIVE!”, “BOMBSHELL!”, “SMOKING GUN!” or “BOOM!” in them.
They always disappoint.
Does anyone doubt the recent meeting between Obama and FBI director Comey was a “don’t forget who signs your paycheck” moment. Comey and the FBI are frantically looking for an angle that covers Hillary with enough plausible deniability to avoid the appearance of corruption when Loretta Lynch later “declines” to prosecute her.
The safest bet on earth is one against prosecution for Hillary.
“Nothing to see here, folks. Just move along!”
-The Presstitutes aka ABCCBSNBCCBCNYTLATWP
“Nothing to see here, folks. Just move along!”
-The Presstitutes aka ABCCBSNBCCBCNYTLATWP
(Better formatted for easier reading)
Hillary Clinton has repeatedly denied any wrong doing when she used a private email account on a private email server while serving as secretary of state. She insisted that she hadn’t violated any sort of policies regarding classified information. Well, it appears that a ‘smoking gun’ has emerged- and it’s BIG!
Clinton did, in fact sign a non-disclosure agreement acknowledging her responsibility to ascertain whether information shared by her was, in fact, classified. Moreover, the document Clinton signed clearly lays out stiff criminal penalties for “any unauthorized disclosure” of classified information.
(The weird-character problem for posting is still an issue it would appear.)
Only if Politico can somehow weave Ben Carson into the narrative.
It’s funny, she claimed that her lawyers did that. But then several minutes later she said that SHE decided what emails Sidney should stay and which ones should go.
A bit more info:
As the nation’s chief diplomat, Hillary Clinton was responsible for ascertaining whether information in her possession was classified and acknowledged that “negligent handling” of that information could jeopardize national security, according to a copy of an agreement she signed upon taking the job.
A day after assuming office as secretary of state, Clinton signed a Sensitive Compartmented Information Nondisclosure Agreement that laid out criminal penalties for “any unauthorized disclosure” of classified information.
Experts have guessed that Clinton signed such an agreement, but a copy of her specific contract, obtained by the Competitive Enterprise Institute through an open records request and shared with the Washington Free Beacon, reveals for the first time the exact language of the NDA.
“I have been advised that the unauthorized disclosure, unauthorized retention, or negligent handling of SCI [Sensitive Compartmented Information] by me could cause irreparable injury to the United States or be used to advantage by a foreign nation,” the agreement states.
“Hillary is running for a lot of reasons—one of ‘em is because she wants to stay out of jail.”
Trump added that, “if we had honest government, Hillary wouldn’t be allowed to run.”
Trump mentioned that General David Patreaus got two years probation for sharing classified information with his mistress “and he was somebody that everybody liked, everybody respected.”
“What [Hillary Clinton] did is so much worse,” Trump said. “If I win, we’re going to look into that crime very, very seriously folks.”
You left out “bombshell”.
“Only if Politico can somehow weave Ben Carson into the narrative”.
Maybe Politico will claim that Dr. Carson sorted her emails.
The woman could strangle a litter of puppies on CNN and still nothing would happen. Smoking gun? Ha!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.