Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin
1. When writing biographical events, the original book should've said the names were fictitious. Did it?

2. If Dr. Carson saying he was given a slot at WP was an "honest mistake", he should've manned up about that and any other inaccuracies in his writings at the very beginning of the campaign.

3. I have no interest in a candidate whose defended by "look what the Clintons get away with". We want candidates who are held to a much higher standard. We've been disappointed by phonies, but that doesn't mean we let up on demanding candidates who respect Constitutional Conservative principles.

4. Do we really want another black candidate who embellishes his life story to further his agenda?

If Dr. Carson were white, there'd be no question. His lack of truthfulness would disqualify him. I am not a racist, so feel no need to overcompensate by accepting Dr. Carson's tenuous connection with the truth.

18 posted on 11/06/2015 2:14:46 PM PST by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: grania

Shame on you for falling into this hit piece.


20 posted on 11/06/2015 2:19:04 PM PST by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson