Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FredZarguna

They can, if they have another open season of getting commitments from companies to use the pipeline to move their oil, another environmental impact study period, another round of public comment, etc.

Years after the application is submitted to approval for a border crossing pipeline.

Yay! We get more oil moved on rail for higher expense!


26 posted on 11/06/2015 9:52:36 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: thackney
We get more oil moved on rail for higher expense!

And considerably more likelihood of environmental damage. [http://www.wsj.com/articles/how-to-transport-oil-more-safely-1442197722] But it's pointless to argue facts and logic with progtards.

Still... Zero gets his high-visibility-anti-carbon moment going into Paris, and appearance is, after all, the only thing that matters.

49 posted on 11/06/2015 10:46:24 AM PST by FredZarguna (Eat pork: Annoy the UN.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson