Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: C210N
I thought he was killing Keystone by dragging out the “NO”, and now what was implicit becomes explicit.

He must have hit the point where he figured a later rejection would be harmful to the Democrats in next November and would allow time for the Canadians to wait it out (imagine a January 19, 2017 rejection which could be reversed in two days). Now, the pipeline to the Pacific for the Chinese will be started immediately and won't be stopped even if this is reversed in 2017.

20 posted on 11/06/2015 8:26:30 AM PST by KarlInOhio (CNBC = Clowns Neutered By Cruz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: KarlInOhio

Actually, TransCanada will just focus on the Energy East Pipeline, adding 1,600 km of new pipeline and converting 3,000 km of NG pipeline to crude. It will run from Hardisty, AB to Saint John, NB, where Canada’s largest refinery (Irving Oil) is located.

Currently, the majority of refining in Eastern Canada is of Middle Eastern crude. This pipeline, if approved by Turd-owe and the Lieberals, would do much to reduce Eastern Canada’s dependence on foreign oil. Some may be exported, but I would hope that much will be used here in Canada.

AFA twinning the TransMountain Pipeline, THAT is less certain, as many First Nations (aka Natives, Indian’s, etc.) object to such work on a pipeline through their ‘territories’. Turd-owe, every the politically-correct leftist, won’t want to pizz-off the First Nations.

I suspect China will be SOL to receive much Canadian crude.


36 posted on 11/06/2015 9:01:24 AM PST by A Formerly Proud Canadian (I once was blind but now I see...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson