Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: discostu
[FBI sting] My question was why four years?
Because you can say anything and it doesn’t make it true. Unless they can connect what you say to physical evidence of some kind it is meaningless.

I understand that, but in four years, they couldn't get any physical proof?

63 posted on 11/01/2015 5:53:23 PM PST by Oatka (ES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


To: Oatka

Easily. If he’s talking about stuff he did last month, last year, in a foreign country, there’s no evidence to be had, it’s gone, inaccessible or meaningless. Usually what you need is for them to talk about the future in enough detail you can set surveillance and a sting, or they give away where evidence (like the videos they found) are stored. Sometimes you get enough of a detectable pattern from them talking about the past you can predict the future (if every time he goes to city X he talks about what’s available at a location they can narrow down then they’ve got him). But most of what recording people is about is waiting for that piece of information that let’s them get physical evidence, and then the tape is really only useful to get a warrant and help establish an ownership chain.


64 posted on 11/01/2015 6:00:28 PM PST by discostu (Up-Up-Down-Down-Left-Right-Left-Right B, A, Start)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson