Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Amntn

Didn’t say that.

But Disney didn’t move to replace their IT dept to save bucks. The dept was in serious trouble and had been for awhile. Disney hired a contract company to bail out its IT dept and that company performed several projects on time under budget and most important, compared to their in house IT, finished products that actually work.

So. Disney greatly expanded its contract with the company and that company went looking for H1Bs.

Orlando is a very unique employment area. The amusement park industry there hires something in the neighborhood of 200,000 employees. Disney alone hires something like 95,000 employees in the Orlando area.

This is why Disney recruits other workers, like hospitality guests, from all over. There isn’t enough of a labor pool in Orlando for all the jobs needed.

I’m going to go hunt and find a very long discussion on this very issue: how the labor shortage for the kinds of jobs needed in the amusement park industry in Orlando affects potential future growth...

There’s more than one side to every story and the bottom line is Disney IT needed to be fired. The IT dept was costing Disney hundreds of millions of dollars in magic band system overruns and underperformance alone.


51 posted on 10/29/2015 5:45:23 PM PDT by ziravan (Buck the Establishment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: ziravan

I’m not saying they didn’t need to be replaced but was any effort made to hire American workers?

What would they have done had H1b’s not been an option?

That is what Trump is saying in his policy. H1B’s can’t be hired just to save money.


55 posted on 10/29/2015 5:53:56 PM PDT by Amntn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

To: ziravan

Here’s a very long and interesting discussion about the difficulties of hiring in the Orlando area:

http://www.disboards.com/threads/disney-why-the-tdo-footprint-constraint.3289198/


57 posted on 10/29/2015 5:54:46 PM PDT by ziravan (Buck the Establishment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

To: ziravan
“But Disney didn�€™t move to replace their IT dept to save bucks. The dept was in serious trouble and had been for awhile. Disney hired a contract company to bail out its IT dept and that company performed several projects on time under budget and most important, compared to their in house IT, finished products that actually work.”

So if what you are saying is true, why, if these American workers were so bad, has Disney more or less demanded that they stay on and “train” their replacements? When I was an Engineering Manager, I got rid of under-performers and I didn't keep them on the payroll to train their replacements. That's simply inviting a disaster.

81 posted on 10/29/2015 11:37:16 PM PDT by vette6387 (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson