Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bob434

That’s not even the worst of his ideologies- He’s for a panel to decide which seniors deserve life saving treatment/end of life care, and which ones don’t

[[Our mind-set is to automatically pull out all medical stops—even if that means literally torturing loved ones during their last few months of life. What if rather than always putting terminally ill patients in intensive care units—where we poke, prod, test, and operate ad nauseum—we allowed most people the dignity of dying in relative peace and comfort, at home, surrounded by loved ones, with hospice care or some other medical attendant if necessary? Agreement on who should be treated and who should not be treated would require an extensive national discussion that could hopefully result in some helpful basic guidelines. Obviously any such guidelines should allow for flexibility and choice. And decisions should be based not merely on age but on the viability of the patient. (From his 1999 book, The Big Picture.)]]


Yikes! I was not aware of this :(


89 posted on 10/26/2015 1:22:31 AM PDT by Freedom56v2 (Make 'em squeal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]


To: bushwon

I don’t think many people are aware of it- I stumbled across it looking for the voting records and ideologies of candidates-


105 posted on 10/26/2015 9:05:58 AM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson